Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

530
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
530
False Memories01:18

False Memories

533
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
533
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

7.1K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
7.1K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

1.5K
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
1.5K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

7.5K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Milestones in the evolution of standards for experimental treatment or research.

Medicine and law·2006
Same author

Informed consent and defenses to a lack of informed consent.

The Journal of psychiatry & law·2004
Same author

Civil commitment laws: an analysis and critique.

Cooley law review·2002
Same author

On making a travesty of triability.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2001
Same author

Commentary: Psychiatric consultation on witness preparation.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2001
Same author

The prosecution of Nathaniel Abraham--a minor.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2000

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K

Expert testimony: use and abuse

R Slovenko1

  • 1Wayne State University Law School, Detroit, MI.

Medicine and Law
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

This article examines legal controversies surrounding new expert testimony, including the scope of admissible evidence and the basis for expert opinions. It addresses challenges in presenting expert evidence in legal proceedings.

Area of Science:

  • Law
  • Evidence Law
  • Expert Testimony

Background:

  • The admissibility and scope of expert testimony in legal proceedings are subject to ongoing debate.
  • Courts grapple with defining the boundaries of permissible expert evidence and the foundational requirements for expert opinions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the controversies surrounding new types of expertise in evidence law.
  • To analyze the permissible scope of expert testimony.
  • To examine the proper basis for expert opinions and their presentation format.

Main Methods:

  • This article provides a discussion and analysis of existing legal principles and case law.
  • It synthesizes arguments concerning the admissibility and form of expert evidence.

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.9K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.9K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Main Results:

  • Controversies persist regarding the admissibility of novel forms of expertise.
  • Disagreements exist on the appropriate factual and scientific basis required for expert opinions.
  • The format in which expert testimony can be presented remains a point of contention.

Conclusions:

  • The law of evidence faces significant challenges in adapting to new forms of expertise.
  • Clearer guidelines are needed to address the scope, basis, and form of expert testimony to ensure fairness and reliability in legal proceedings.