Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Problem-solving in general practice

J Ridderikhoff1

  • 1Erasmus University Rotterdam, Department of Family Medicine, The Netherlands.

Theoretical Medicine
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

General practitioners primarily use inductive reasoning, specifically a speculative variant akin to iterative pattern recognition, not deductive strategies. This approach, while flexible, presents challenges in reproducibility for medical problem-solving.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hip problems in older adults: classification by cluster analysis.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2001
Same author

Who is afraid of the system? Doctors' attitude towards diagnostic systems.

International journal of medical informatics·1999
Same author

Comparison between two devices for measuring hip joint motions.

Clinical rehabilitation·1998
Same author

The diagnosis of allergic rhinitis: how to combine the medical history with the results of radioallergosorbent tests and skin prick tests.

Scandinavian journal of primary health care·1998
Same author

A diagnostic support system in general practice: is it feasible?

International journal of medical informatics·1997
Same author

[Cluster headache: misjudged because unknown].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·1997

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Cognitive Science in Medicine
  • General Practice Research

Background:

  • Understanding physician decision-making is crucial for improving patient care.
  • General practice relies on complex problem-solving skills.
  • Existing models of scientific reasoning may not fully capture clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and characterize the problem-solving strategies employed in general practice.
  • To evaluate the applicability of established scientific reasoning models to clinical encounters.

Main Methods:

  • Defined three styles of scientific reasoning (deductive, hypothetico-deductive, inductive).
  • Modeled these reasoning styles within a medical context.
  • Tested the models through simulated doctor-patient encounters.

Main Results:

  • No deductive or hypothetico-deductive strategies were observed in participants.
  • All general practitioners exclusively utilized the inductive method.
  • The predominant inductive variant was a speculative form, characterized by iterative pattern recognition.

Conclusions:

  • The consistent use of inductive reasoning has implications for the traceability and reproducibility of medical problem-solving.
  • The speculative inductive method aligns with the perception of medicine as an art, offering flexibility and rapid patient response.
  • This highlights a potential gap between scientific ideals and clinical reality in diagnostic reasoning.

Related Experiment Videos