The influence of a bilateral peripheral vestibular deficit on postural synergies

The role of vestibular sensory information in the triggering, selection and modulation of postural response synergies was evaluated by comparing the EMG responses of normal subjects to balance perturbations with those of subjects with a bilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. The balance perturbations were a rotation and/or a translation of a support surface on which the test subjects stood with eyes open. Onset latencies and most timing patterns of muscle responses were not altered in vestibular-loss subjects. Major changes were observed, however, in the muscle amplitude synergy. Responses between 120 and 240 ms in tibialis anterior, soleus, and quadriceps muscles were reduced more than 50% with respect to normal amplitudes. In contrast, responses in paraspinal muscles were enhanced nearly 100% with respect to normal values. These changes in muscle amplitudes with accompanying vestibular loss were highest for rotation and lowest for translation perturbations. The identification of a bilateral vestibular loss using EMG amplitudes was always 100% correct for rotation perturbations and between 75 to 85% correct for translation perturbations. Multivariate linear correlations between muscle EMG response areas, and the amplitudes of initial link velocities revealed an increased contribution of afferent signals from the upper leg and a decreased dependence on signals from the trunk and head to postural synergies in vestibular-loss subjects. The afferent modulation of the muscle amplitude synergy correcting a balance disturbance to the stance of normal subjects is, on the basis of these findings, highly dependent on vestibular afferent signals. Our results indicate that vestibular afferent signals are used to enhance the amplitude of responses in tibialis anterior, quadriceps, and soleus muscles; and inhibit the responses of paraspinal muscles, once the response timing has been triggered and selected by proprioceptive signals. Lacking this modulation, bilateral vestibular deficit subjects respond to balance perturbations under eyes-open conditions as if the perturbation were 50% slower. Clinically, our results document that the perturbation of choice, when testing vestibular deficit patients, is a rotation (greater than 3 degrees in amplitude and 15 degrees/s in velocity) and not a translation of the support surface.