Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standing

M Rys1, S Konz

  • 1Department of Industrial Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.

Ergonomics
|April 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review synthesizes six years of research on human standing. It covers anthropometry, physiological criteria for comfort, various floor surfaces, and optimal standing postures for better health.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring lower leg swelling: optimum frequency for impedance method.

Medical & biological engineering & computing·2001
Same author

[Internet telediagnosis and teletherapy which should not do harm].

Psychiatria polska·2000
Same author

[As, in spite of protest and internal resistance to saying what one is thinking, being open, on friendly terms with others--or introduction to phenomenology lacking agreement].

Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960)·1993
Same author

[Psychometric studies of healthy persons and patients].

Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej·1983
Same author

NIOSH lifting guidelines.

American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1982
Same author

[Information disequilibrium and methods of its correction].

Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960)·1981
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Human standing is a fundamental yet complex activity.
  • Understanding factors influencing standing is crucial for health and comfort.
  • Previous research has explored various facets of standing behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To consolidate and review 12 papers by the authors on human standing.
  • To provide a comprehensive overview of key aspects influencing standing.
  • To synthesize findings on anthropometry, physiological criteria, floor surfaces, and posture.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and synthesis of 12 previously published papers.
  • Analysis of anthropometric data including foot dimensions and leg-length discrepancy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of physiological criteria and body comfort votes.
  • Examination of different floor surfaces (concrete, rubber mats, carpet).
  • Assessment of various standing postures.

    • Main Results:

    • Foot dimensions and leg-length discrepancy are relevant anthropometric factors.
    • Physiological criteria and comfort votes offer insights into standing usefulness.
    • Floor surface properties significantly impact standing experience.
    • Distinct standing postures have varying physiological and comfort implications.

    Conclusions:

    • Standing is influenced by a combination of individual anthropometry, environmental factors, and postural choices.
    • Further research into optimizing standing conditions can improve user well-being.
    • This review provides a consolidated knowledge base for future ergonomic studies on standing.