Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Consistency of sperm morphology classification methods

R O Davis1, C G Gravance

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California-Davis 95616.

Journal of Andrology
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Review of clinical presentation and diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis IVA.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2013
Same author

Propranolol in myocardial infarction.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Pre-freeze bull sperm head morphometry related to post-thaw fertility.

Animal reproduction science·2008
Same author

Activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in reproductive tissues of the stallion and effects of angiotensin II on sperm motility.

Theriogenology·2003
Same author

Effect of antioxidants on preservation of motility,viability and acrosomal integrity of equine spermatozoa during storage at 5 degrees C.

Theriogenology·2001
Same author

Seminal plasma addition attenuates the dilution effect in bovine sperm.

Theriogenology·2001
Same journal

Special Section: Commemorating the Journal of Andrology's Distinguished History.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

Parting messages from current and former editors of the Journal of Andrology.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

Evolution of the Journal of Andrology and a bright future for Andrology.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

Management of erectile dysfunction: great progress, greater promise.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

Aging and declining testosterone: past, present, and hopes for the future.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

The genetics of male fertility--from basic science to clinical evaluation.

Journal of andrology·2012
See all related articles

New World Health Organization (WHO) sperm morphology guidelines and the Kruger method are inappropriate linear models. Valid allometric models demonstrate that sperm morphology assessment significantly impacts results, limiting prognostic value.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive biology
  • Statistical modeling
  • Sperm analysis

Background:

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) updated sperm head morphometric dimensions and classification rules.
  • Current WHO and Kruger methods for sperm morphology assessment differ from traditional allometric modeling.
  • Previous methods may lack statistical rigor for accurate sperm analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the appropriateness of WHO and Kruger sperm classification rules as predictive linear models.
  • To develop and validate allometric models for sperm head dimensions.
  • To compare the empirical consequences of different sperm morphology assessment methods.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of WHO and Kruger sperm classification rules against allometric modeling requirements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of allometric models using over 3,700 digitized sperm head measurements.
  • Implementation and comparison of WHO, Kruger, and allometric methods on identical sperm head datasets.

    • Main Results:

    • WHO and Kruger methods, while internally consistent, exhibit nonconstant variance, rendering them inappropriate linear models.
    • Allometric models demonstrated internal consistency and constant variance, qualifying them as appropriate linear models.
    • Significant variations in the percentage of normal sperm were observed across methods, with allometric models yielding higher values than WHO and Kruger methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Current WHO and Kruger sperm morphology assessment methods are statistically inappropriate as linear models.
    • Allometric models provide a more statistically valid approach to sperm head morphometrics.
    • Differences in metric requirements and classification rules significantly alter sperm morphology results, impacting prognostic value.