Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?

H Pashler1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divided attention: Storing and classifying briefly presented objects.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses.

Consciousness and cognition·2001
Same author

Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

Perception and production of brief durations: beat-based versus interval-based timing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated dual-task interference, finding evidence for a structural central bottleneck rather than flexible resource sharing. The central bottleneck model better explains how processing limitations affect performance on simultaneous tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Dual-task interference is often attributed to a central bottleneck, response grouping, and impaired preparation.
  • Previous research may have overemphasized the first response, potentially limiting the investigation of resource sharing between tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the role of a central bottleneck in dual-task interference under conditions of equal task emphasis.
  • To differentiate between a structural bottleneck and strategic resource sharing.

Main Methods:

  • Two choice reaction-time tasks with simultaneous stimuli presentation on 20% of trials.
  • Instructions emphasized both tasks equally to encourage resource sharing.
  • Analysis of interresponse intervals to identify bimodality predicted by bottleneck models.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Most participants exhibited bimodality in interresponse intervals, supporting a central bottleneck.
  • Evidence of response grouping was observed in a subset of participants.
  • Findings suggest a structural limitation rather than a strategic trade-off of processing resources.

Conclusions:

  • The central bottleneck appears to be a structural limitation in cognitive processing.
  • Graded sharing of processing resources between tasks is less plausible under these experimental conditions.
  • The findings contribute to understanding the fundamental constraints of human information processing.