Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Authors have rights too

M E Dewey1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Liverpool.

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
|January 30, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Publication is crucial for research impact. While author guidelines are plentiful, this study highlights inconsistent adherence by editors, suggesting a need for improved communication strategies in scientific publishing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health, Disability, and Economic Inactivity Following a Diagnosis of a Severe Mental Illness: Cohort Study of Electronic Health Records Linked at the Individual-Level, to Census from England.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2024
Same author

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in people with severe mental illness: inequalities by ethnicity and age. Cross-sectional analysis of 588 408 records from the UK.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2016
Same author

Mild cognitive impairment diagnosed with the new DSM-5 criteria: prevalence and associations with non-cognitive psychopathology.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2014
Same author

Role of grammatical clues in multiple choice questions: an empirical study.

Medical teacher·2014
Same author

Born into adversity: psychological distress in two birth cohorts of second-generation Irish children growing up in Britain.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2013
Same author

Impairment, disability, social support and depression among older parents in rural Thailand.

Psychological medicine·2010
Same journal

Covid-19 vaccine study pulled by US CDC is finally published.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

The doctor will post you now.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

RSV vaccination programme expanded to thousands more vulnerable people.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Adult gender dysphoria services after the Levy review.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Blood pressure and cholesterol levels between normal weight and obese adults have narrowed thanks to medications, study says.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Amos review fallout: national maternity adviser demands answers over removal of "normal birth" harms.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Scientific communication
  • Scholarly publishing
  • Research dissemination

Background:

  • Research requires publication to achieve impact.
  • Authors have numerous established guidelines (e.g., Vancouver style) for manuscript preparation.
  • Existing guidance for editors on publication practices is less consistently applied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of editorial guidance in scientific publishing.
  • To identify areas where communication between authors and editors can be improved.
  • To provide recommendations for enhancing editorial practices.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of anonymous case examples.
  • Review of editorial practices in scientific publication.
  • Qualitative assessment of communication effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The impact of existing editorial guidance has been variable or 'patchy'.
  • Inconsistent application of standards suggests communication gaps.
  • Specific examples illustrate challenges in editorial adherence to guidelines.

Conclusions:

  • Editorial adherence to publication standards requires enhancement.
  • Improved communication strategies are necessary for editors.
  • Strengthening editorial guidance can improve the quality and impact of published research.