Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical trials. How should they be designed?

J E Onken1, S R Brazer

  • 1Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
|April 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mercaptopurine metabolite results in clinical gastroenterology practice.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2002
Same author

Gastroesophageal reflux as a reversible cause of allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Chest·2000
Same author

Active esophageal variceal bleeding treated with band ligation.

Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)·2000
Same author

Rapid progression to high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus after liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation and surgery : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society·1999
Same author

Cameron erosions.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·1999
Same author

Manifestations of Crohn's disease.

Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)·1998

Effective clinical trial design requires a clear question, defined population, and methods to limit bias and chance. While randomized controlled trials are ideal, cost and sample size often necessitate alternative approaches like meta-analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating therapeutic efficacy.
  • High costs and large sample size requirements can limit the feasibility of RCTs.
  • Growing concerns about healthcare costs and practice variability necessitate research into efficient and valuable health services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the fundamental principles of robust clinical trial design.
  • To discuss alternative research methodologies that supplement traditional clinical trials.
  • To highlight the evolving research emphasis towards maximizing healthcare value and patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Key principles of clinical trial design: a priori research questions, precise population definition, statistical control for chance, adequate sample size calculation, and bias limitation through blinding and randomization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of supplementary research methods including meta-analysis, observational database research, and decision analysis.
  • Discussion of the shift in research priorities driven by healthcare economics and practice variations.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful clinical trial design hinges on meticulous planning and execution to ensure valid and reliable results.
    • Alternative methods like meta-analysis offer valuable insights when RCTs are impractical.
    • The focus of health research is increasingly on cost-effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to core design principles is crucial for generating high-quality clinical evidence.
    • Supplementary research methods provide flexible and cost-effective alternatives to traditional trials.
    • Future research must prioritize demonstrating value and improving patient outcomes within economic constraints.