Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A screening procedure for modified simplex in frequency-gain response selection

F K Kuk1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois, at Chicago 60612.

Ear and Hearing
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Considerations in Fitting a Multimemory Hearing Aid.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Theoretical and practical considerations in compression hearing AIDS.

Trends in amplification·2014
Same author

Variables affecting the use of prescriptive formulae to fit modern nonlinear hearing aids.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2000
Same author

Use of a digital hearing aid with directional microphones in school-aged children.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1999
Same author

Comparison of preferred frequency gain settings obtained with category rating and modified simplex procedure.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1996
Same author

Effect of hearing aid experience on preferred insertion gain selection.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1996
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

A new screening protocol reliably identifies hearing aid users needing fine-tuning. This ensures efficient clinical time by only using advanced fitting methods when necessary, improving user satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Hearing Science
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • The modified simplex procedure offers individualized hearing aid fitting.
  • Preference for modified simplex over NAL-R fitting is not universal.
  • Efficient clinical practice requires streamlined fitting protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a screening protocol for identifying hearing aid users who benefit from modified simplex fitting.
  • To assess the efficiency, reliability, sensitivity, and efficacy of the screening protocol.
  • To compare user satisfaction between prescribed and individually selected frequency-gain responses.

Main Methods:

  • Ten hearing aid wearers participated in the study.
  • Participants completed a screening protocol comparing prescribed and alternate frequency-gain responses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Listeners underwent the full modified simplex procedure if they preferred alternate responses in screening.
  • Subjective satisfaction was assessed for both fitting methods.

    • Main Results:

    • The screening protocol reliably identified users needing fine-tuning of their hearing aid frequency-gain response.
    • Increased differences between prescribed and selected responses correlated with higher user satisfaction.
    • The protocol effectively streamlined the use of the modified simplex procedure.

    Conclusions:

    • A pre-fitting screening protocol can efficiently identify hearing aid users who require individualized frequency-gain response adjustments.
    • This approach optimizes clinical time and enhances user satisfaction with hearing aid fittings.
    • The screening protocol demonstrates reliability and sensitivity in guiding fitting decisions.