Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reasoning about food and contamination

S Occhipinti1, M Siegal

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

People reason more logically about food contamination when given clear safety information. Understanding these food reasoning strategies helps ensure safety and prevent contamination concerns.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An investigation of the emotion of disgust as an affective barrier to intention to screen for colorectal cancer.

European journal of cancer care·2016
Same author

Men's help-seeking in the first year after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.

European journal of cancer care·2016
Same author

The gut microbiota and its correlations with the central nervous system disorders.

Panminerva medica·2014
Same author

Irritable bowel syndrome: new findings in pathophysiological and therapeutic field.

Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica·2014
Same author

Solid lipid nanoparticles of cholesteryl butyrate inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo models.

British journal of pharmacology·2013
Same author

Prevalence and predictors of cancer specific distress in men with a family history of prostate cancer.

Psycho-oncology·2013

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Food Safety Research

Background:

  • Human decision-making is influenced by perceived risks, especially concerning food.
  • Understanding how individuals reason about potential food contamination is crucial for public health.
  • Previous research has explored conditional reasoning but less so in the specific context of food safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate reasoning strategies related to food and contamination.
  • To examine how safety information and context influence conditional reasoning about food.
  • To identify factors that facilitate rational decision-making in food-related scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted involving participants' choices regarding substances with ambiguous or explained 'poison' labels.
  • Conditional reasoning was compared between food-related (contamination) and food-irrelevant contexts.
  • Participant ratings of context plausibility, experience, and danger were collected and matched across tasks.

Main Results:

  • Participants avoided substances labeled 'poison' when the labeler's intent was unclear or malicious.
  • Providing a rationale dispelling contamination concerns increased preference for the substance.
  • Formal logic was most frequently employed in reasoning when safety issues involved food contamination.

Conclusions:

  • Reasoning about food contamination is subject to specific adaptive constraints.
  • Safety information significantly impacts decision-making in food contexts, promoting more logical approaches.
  • These findings highlight the domain-specific nature of human rationality in risk assessment.

Related Experiment Videos