Related Experiment Videos

[Legal aspects (with comparative reference to German Law)]

Schweizerische Rundschau Fur Medizin Praxis = Revue Suisse De Medecine Praxis
|May 3, 1994
PubMed

Insights

With advancements in medical technology, withdrawing life support from handicapped newborns is not a viable solution. Legal frameworks must mandate treatment for viable infants, with potential leniency in exceptional circumstances.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Neonatal Care
  • Legal Medicine

Background:

  • Improved medico-technical capabilities present complex ethical considerations in neonatal care.
  • The question of 'letting die' handicapped newborns is a significant challenge for all involved parties.
  • Current medical and legal standards lack definitive tests for authorizing the withdrawal of vital treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ethical and legal implications of treating handicapped newborns.
  • To argue against the practice of 'letting die' in neonatal care.
  • To propose a legal framework for the treatment of viable, handicapped infants.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of neonatal treatment decisions.
  • Review of legal precedents and ethical guidelines.
  • Discussion of medical viability criteria.

Main Results:

  • 'Letting die' is ethically and legally untenable as a solution for handicapped newborns.
  • A reliable test for authorizing the withdrawal of vital treatment is not feasible.
  • Medical treatment must be legally mandated for all viable infants.

Conclusions:

  • The law should mandate medical treatment for viable handicapped newborns.
  • Exceptional cases may warrant relinquishing prosecution of responsible individuals.
  • Ethical medical practice necessitates continued treatment for viable infants.

Related Concept Videos