Related Experiment Videos
The "response" in behavior theory
The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science
|July 1, 1976
Summary
The definition of "response" in behavior theory is unclear, impacting conditioning paradigms. Recent findings show conditioned reflexes may not be unitary, challenging existing response concepts.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral science
- Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- The term "response" is fundamental in behavior theory but lacks a clear, consistent definition.
- Common language origins influence its application in behavioral analysis.
- Current definitions create difficulties in distinguishing response classes and conditioning paradigms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the definition and conceptualization of "response" in behavior theory.
- To highlight the challenges posed by current definitions to understanding conditioning procedures.
- To question the unitary nature of responses in light of new empirical findings.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of the term "response" in behavior theory.
- Review of existing literature on Pavlovian and operant conditioning.
- Examination of recent laboratory findings on conditioned reflexes.
Main Results:
- The common vocabulary origin of "response" complicates its scientific definition.
- Distinctions between response types based on conditioning procedures (Pavlovian vs. operant) are problematic.
- A "conditioned cardiac CR" was found to be fractionated, challenging its status as a single response.
Conclusions:
- Inadequate definitions of "response" create significant problems for behavior theory.
- The fractionation of conditioned reflexes suggests current conceptions of "response" require revision.
- A clearer, more precise definition of "response" is needed for advancing behavioral science.