Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences in obstetrical intervention rates between Dutch hospitals

P M Elferink-Stinkens1, O J Van Hemel, R Brand

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Teaching Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
|March 15, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of performance and information feedback on medical interns' confidence-accuracy calibration.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2023
Same author

Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners' referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study.

BMC medical education·2022
Same author

Spontaneous buckling of contractile poroelastic actomyosin sheets.

Nature communications·2018
Same author

Alloreactivity: the Janus-face of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Leukemia·2017
Same author

Second allogeneic transplantation for relapse of malignant disease: retrospective analysis of outcome and predictive factors by the EBMT.

Bone marrow transplantation·2015
Same author

Causal effect estimation strategies in a longitudinal study with complex time-varying confounders: A tutorial.

Statistical methods in medical research·2014

Hospital policies significantly impact rates of labor induction, cesarean sections, and operative vaginal births, varying more than patient factors alone. Further analysis is needed for fair hospital comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Perinatal Medicine

Background:

  • The 'Obstetric Peer Review' (Verloskundige Onderlinge Kwaliteitsspiegeling, VOKS) project aims to assess variations in obstetric care.
  • Significant differences in obstetric intervention rates exist between Dutch hospitals.
  • These variations persist even when accounting for patient complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and quantify differences in obstetric intervention frequencies among Dutch hospitals.
  • To determine if hospital-specific policies or patient population differences are primary drivers of intervention rates.
  • To establish the necessity for adjusted analyses to enable fair hospital comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the Perinatal Database of the Netherlands.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed data from hospitals with at least 2000 births over a 5-year period (1987-1991).
  • Focused on interventions including labor induction, cesarean section, and vaginal operative deliveries within homogeneous subgroups.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated remarkable differences in the frequencies of labor induction, cesarean sections, and vaginal operative deliveries across hospitals.
    • Found that hospital policy appeared to be a more significant factor than population differences in explaining intervention rates.
    • Highlighted the need for multivariate analysis to adjust for population variations.

    Conclusions:

    • Obstetric intervention rates vary substantially between hospitals, suggesting policy-driven differences.
    • A fair comparison of hospital intervention policies requires adjusting for population characteristics.
    • Multivariate analysis is crucial for unbiased estimation of intervention risks and hospital performance.