Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Marginal integrity: clinical significance

J F Roulet1

  • 1Free University, Berlin, Germany.

Journal of Dentistry
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating the marginal integrity of dental restorations is crucial for preventing secondary caries and pulpal issues. Both laboratory and clinical assessments have limitations, potentially leading to inaccurate material evaluations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Combination of CQ-amine and TPO Increases the Polymerization Shrinkage Stress and Does Not Improve the Depth of Cure of Bulk-fill Composites.

Operative dentistry·2019
Same author

A shift of focus?

The journal of adhesive dentistry·2015
Same author

Influence of cavity preparation, light-curing units, and composite filling on intrapulpal temperature increase in an in vitro tooth model.

Operative dentistry·2014
Same author

Open-access journals - a scientific thriller.

The journal of adhesive dentistry·2014
Same author

Research for research's sake?

The journal of adhesive dentistry·2009
Same author

Adhesion--a fix for everything?

The journal of adhesive dentistry·2008
Same journal

Pre-clinical evaluation of the anticaries effect of an experimental Malva sylvestris extract mouthwash using a cariogenic model in situ.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Five-Year Outcomes of Zirconia and Fiber-Reinforced Composite Cantilever Inlay-Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses with Different Retainer Designs: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

ACCURACY OF 2D FACIAL PROFILE PHOTOGRAPHS UNDER ROUTINE CLINICAL CONDITIONS COMPARED WITH 3D IMAGING.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Adhesion of resin composites to 3D-printed dental resins: A study on the effect of surface conditioning methods and repair materials.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

DGADS: A Graph-based Agentic Decision Support System for Precision Dental Question Answering.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Preventive Effects of a Strontium‑Containing Nano Bioactive Glass Hydrogel Against Enamel Caries: An In Vitro Study.

Journal of dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Restorative Dentistry
  • Clinical Oral Health

Background:

  • Marginal integrity of dental restorations is critical for preventing recurrent caries and pulpal disease.
  • Current methods for assessing marginal integrity, both in vitro and in vivo, face significant challenges.
  • In vitro testing is hampered by complex interactions and interpretation difficulties.
  • Clinical evaluations are limited by the diagnostic capabilities of practitioners.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the inherent limitations in current methodologies for evaluating the marginal integrity of dental restorations.
  • To emphasize the need for the scientific community to acknowledge these limitations in material assessment.

Main Methods:

  • This study critically reviews existing in vitro and in vivo testing protocols for marginal integrity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It analyzes the challenges associated with interpreting data from laboratory experiments.
  • It discusses the diagnostic uncertainties present in clinical evaluations of restoration margins.

    • Main Results:

    • In vitro testing methods for marginal integrity are associated with significant uncertainty due to complex interactions.
    • Clinical evaluation of marginal integrity is unreliable due to variability in clinician diagnostic skills.
    • Existing assessment methods may lead to misjudgment of dental material performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The scientific community must acknowledge the severe limitations of both in vitro and in vivo testing for marginal integrity.
    • Acceptance of these limitations is necessary to prevent the misjudgment of dental materials during evaluation.
    • Improved diagnostic tools and standardized in vitro models are needed for more reliable assessment.