Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modulation detection and discrimination with three-component signals

B W Edwards1, N F Viemeister

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|April 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation in electric hearing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Observer weighting of monaural level information in a pair of tone pulses.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Female predominance in spasmodic dysphonia.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·1998
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated how humans process mixed modulation (AM and FM) signals. Results suggest a single internal process, rather than separate ones, is used for detecting and discriminating these complex auditory signals.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Signal Processing
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Amplitude Modulation (AM) and Frequency Modulation (FM) are fundamental acoustic cues.
  • Understanding how the auditory system processes combined AM and FM (mixed modulation, MM) is crucial for explaining auditory perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the detection and discrimination of mixed modulation (MM) signals.
  • To evaluate existing models of auditory cue processing for MM signals.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed modulation detection and discrimination tasks using three-component MM signals.
  • Data were analyzed using single-cue and two-cue summation models.

Main Results:

  • A single-cue model accurately predicted modulation detection thresholds.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A two-cue summation model also predicted detection thresholds, suggesting a shared internal noise source.
  • The single-cue model effectively predicted discrimination performance, while the two-cue model required cue combination before decision-making.

    • Conclusions:

    • The auditory system likely processes mixed modulation signals through a unified mechanism rather than separate AM and FM channels.
    • Internal noise may influence the integration of AM and FM information along a single decision axis.
    • Listeners appear to combine AM and FM cues into a single perceptual statistic for discrimination tasks.