Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multichannel cochlear implantation with percutaneous pedestal

J L Parkin1, M J Parkin

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Multichannel cochlear implants significantly improve patient communication skills compared to single-channel devices. The Ineraid system demonstrates good patient experience with its percutaneous pedestal, with few long-term issues.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dental observations of hyper IgE disorder.

The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry·2008
Same author

An in-vitro comparison of the radiographic and actual gutta-percha terminus.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2001
Same author

Overlapping thin-section fast spin-echo MR of the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·1997
Same author

Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·1997
Same author

Percutaneous pedestal in cochlear implantation.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·1997
Same author

Osseointegration and growth effects of temporal bone percutaneous pedestals.

The American journal of otology·1996

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Assessing the efficacy of multichannel cochlear implant systems.
  • Evaluating patient experience with the Ineraid percutaneous pedestal system.

Observation:

  • Prospective study comparing multichannel and single-channel cochlear implant performance.
  • Monitoring patient experience and complications related to the Ineraid percutaneous pedestal.

Findings:

  • Multichannel cochlear implants show superior patient performance over single-channel implants.
  • The Ineraid system's percutaneous pedestal is well-tolerated, with a low rate of serious complications.
  • Pedestal-related issues decrease over time post-implantation.

Implications:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Multichannel cochlear implants offer enhanced auditory rehabilitation.
  • The Ineraid system provides a viable and safe option for cochlear implantation.
  • Further research into optimizing cochlear implant technology for improved communication is warranted.