Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

A Novel Rescue Technique for Difficult Intubation and Difficult Ventilation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Evaluation of the interrupter technique for the use of assessing airway obstruction in children
E R Carter1, A A Stecenko, B H Pollock
1Division of Pulmonary Diseases, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.
Insights
The interrupter technique effectively assesses airway obstruction in children, correlating well with standard pulmonary function tests like FEV1 and FEF25-75. This noninvasive method shows promise for evaluating airway resistance in pediatric respiratory conditions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Respiratory Physiology
- Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques
Background:
- Assessing airway obstruction in children is crucial for diagnosing and managing respiratory diseases.
- Traditional methods for measuring airway resistance can be invasive or difficult to perform in pediatric populations.
- The interrupter technique offers a potentially simpler, noninvasive alternative for evaluating airflow resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the interrupter technique in assessing airway obstruction in children.
- To correlate measurements from the interrupter technique with established pulmonary function tests.
- To compare the interrupter technique's ability to detect changes in airway resistance with body plethysmography.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a study involving 107 children (74 with asthma, 12 with cystic fibrosis, 21 healthy).
- Measured airway conductance (Gint) using the interrupter technique and correlated it with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and FEF25-75.
- In 17 asthmatic children, compared airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique (Rint) with body plethysmography (Raw) before and after treatment.
Main Results:
- High linear correlations were observed between interrupter technique conductance (Gint) and FEV1 (r=0.77 for expiratory, r=0.76 for inspiratory).
- Good linear correlations were found between Gint and FEF25-75 (r=0.70 for expiratory, r=0.67 for inspiratory).
- Interrupter technique resistance (Rint) showed strong correlation with body plethysmography resistance (Raw) in asthmatic children (r=0.91 for expiratory, r=0.83 for inspiratory), with similar pre- to post-treatment changes.
Conclusions:
- The interrupter technique is a valid and reliable method for assessing airway obstruction in children.
- Measurements of airway resistance and conductance using the interrupter technique correlate well with standard pulmonary function tests.
- This noninvasive technique can effectively monitor changes in airway obstruction, making it a valuable tool in pediatric respiratory care.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to determine if the interrupter technique, a noninvasive method for measuring airflow resistance, could be used to assess airway obstruction in children. In 107 children (74 with asthma, 12 with cystic fibrosis, and 21 without lung disease) conductance (mostly of airways) measured with the interrupter technique (Gint) was correlated with both forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and the forced expired flow rate between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25-75). In addition, 17 children with significant airway obstruction due to asthma also had airway resistance measured by body plethysmography (R(aw)) before and after treatment. Resistance and conductance measurements made with the interrupter technique were subdivided into inspiratory (Rint-insp, Gint-insp) and expiratory (Rint-exp, Gint-exp) values. In the 107 children, a high degree of linear correlation was found between Gint and FEV1; for Gint-exp, r = 0.77 (P < 0.001), and for Gint-insp, r = 0.76 (P < 0.001). There was also good linear correlation between Gint and FEF25-75; for Gint-exp, r = 0.70 (P < 0.001), and for Gint-insp, r = 0.67 (P < 0.001). In the 17 asthmatic children who were tested before and after treatment of their airway obstruction, Rint correlated highly with R(aw); for Rint-exp, r = 0.91 (P < 0.001), and for Rint-insp, r = 0.83 (P < 0.001). The pre- to post-treatment changes in Rint and R(aw) were similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques

