Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When pregnant patients refuse interventions

C A Tauer

    Awhonn'S Clinical Issues in Perinatal and Women'S Health Nursing
    |January 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary

    Informed pregnant patients can refuse standard prenatal screenings and interventions. However, maternal autonomy may be limited if fetal harm is certain and vaginal delivery poses risks to both mother and fetus.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Genetics and the common good.

    Second opinion (Chicago, Ill. : 1999)·2005
    Same author

    Personal privacy and the common good. Genetic testing raises ethical considerations for both patients and clinicians.

    Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)·2001
    Same author

    Genetic testing and discrimination. How can we protect job and insurance policy applicants from negative test consequences?

    Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)·2001
    Same author

    Private ethics boards and public debate.

    The Hastings Center report·1999
    Same author

    Embryo research and public policy: a philosopher's appraisal.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·1997
    Same author

    The politics of human-embryo research.

    The New England journal of medicine·1996

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Obstetrics
    • Patient Autonomy

    Background:

    • Effective clinician-patient communication is crucial for navigating decision-making in pregnancy.
    • Pregnant patients possess the right to refuse prenatal screening and standard obstetric interventions based on available evidence and personal values.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the ethical considerations surrounding patient autonomy in obstetric decision-making.
    • To analyze the balance between maternal autonomy and potential harm to the fetus in various obstetric scenarios.

    Main Methods:

    • Ethical analysis of clinical scenarios in obstetrics.
    • Review of existing literature on patient autonomy and obstetric interventions.

    Main Results:

    • Pregnant women can ethically refuse prenatal screening due to uncertain follow-up options.
    • Evidence questions the necessity of certain standard obstetric interventions, supporting patient refusal.
    • Maternal autonomy is generally upheld, even in refusing cesarean delivery, due to uncertain harm predictions.

    Conclusions:

    • While patient autonomy is paramount, it can be ethically limited in rare cases where fetal harm is imminent and vaginal delivery endangers the mother.
    • In exceptional circumstances, coercion may be ethically justifiable to prevent near-certain harm to the fetus and mother.
    Keywords:
    Genetics and ReproductionProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos