Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reviewing manuscripts: developing an efficient system

J A Brooks-Brunn

    Nurse Author & Editor
    |January 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Develop an efficient manuscript review system by prioritizing accuracy, organization, and clarity. An experienced reviewer shares key focus areas for effective manuscript evaluation and scientific communication.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Esophageal cancer: an overview.

    Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·2002
    Same author

    Risk factors associated with postoperative pulmonary complications following total abdominal hysterectomy.

    Clinical nursing research·2001
    Same author

    Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis palmaris: a periareolar approach.

    The Annals of thoracic surgery·2000
    Same author

    Research priorities in respiratory nursing.

    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·1999
    Same author

    Validation of a predictive model for postoperative pulmonary complications.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·1998
    Same author

    How and when to reference.

    Nurse author & editor·1998
    Same journal

    Developing new peer reviewers: tips for editors.

    Nurse author & editor·2005
    Same journal

    How accurate are references in nursing journals?

    Nurse author & editor·2005
    Same journal

    The manuscript option dissertation: multiple perspectives.

    Nurse author & editor·2005
    Same journal

    After the critique: revise and resubmit your manuscript.

    Nurse author & editor·2005
    Same journal

    Plagiarism.

    Nurse author & editor·2005
    Same journal

    Tips for success: matching journals and topics.

    Nurse author & editor·2005
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific Publishing
    • Manuscript Evaluation
    • Peer Review Process

    Background:

    • Manuscript review is critical for scientific integrity.
    • Efficient review systems enhance publication speed and quality.
    • Clarity in feedback aids authors in manuscript improvement.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline a systematic approach for manuscript review.
    • To identify key elements for effective manuscript evaluation.
    • To guide reviewers in providing constructive and accurate feedback.

    Main Methods:

    • Focusing on accuracy in assessing scientific content.
    • Implementing organizational strategies for efficient review workflow.
    • Ensuring clarity in written reviewer comments and recommendations.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • An organized and clear review process improves efficiency.
    • Accuracy in evaluation upholds scientific standards.
    • Effective feedback facilitates manuscript revision and acceptance.

    Conclusions:

    • Prioritizing accuracy, organization, and clarity leads to an efficient manuscript review system.
    • This approach enhances the quality of scientific publications.
    • Adopting these principles benefits both reviewers and authors.