Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical practice guidelines: policy issues and legal implications

S M Merz1

  • 1Association of Academic Health Centers, Washington, DC 20036.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|August 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Physicians face legal questions regarding clinical practice guidelines, including liability for cost-driven decisions and conflicts between medical judgment and guidelines. Legal immunity for guideline developers also remains a complex issue.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Conference overview: through the patient's eyes--improvement tools for the new millennium.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

The new Northwestern Memorial Hospital: planned, constructed, and operated through the patients first philosophy.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Developing partnerships among patients, families, and staff at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Quality improvements in end of life care: insights from two collaboratives.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008

Area of Science:

  • Legal medicine
  • Healthcare policy
  • Medical ethics

Background:

  • Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are increasingly influential in healthcare delivery.
  • The rise of CPGs introduces complex legal challenges impacting physicians and developers.
  • Existing legal frameworks may not adequately address the nuances of CPG implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the emerging legal questions surrounding clinical practice guidelines.
  • To explore potential physician liability when adhering to or deviating from guidelines.
  • To assess the need for civil immunity for guideline developers and implementers.

Main Methods:

  • This study involves a legal analysis of existing case law and statutes.
  • It examines hypothetical scenarios concerning physician liability and guideline conflicts.
  • The research synthesizes legal scholarship on medical malpractice and evidence in court.

Main Results:

  • Physicians may face liability if cost-containment guidelines conflict with sound medical judgment.
  • The extent of civil immunity for guideline developers requires further legal clarification.
  • Judicial responses to guidelines as evidence, especially conflicting ones, are unpredictable.

Conclusions:

  • The integration of clinical practice guidelines into legal settings necessitates a re-evaluation of liability standards.
  • Clearer legal precedents are needed to guide physicians and protect developers.
  • Addressing these legal ambiguities is crucial for the effective and ethical use of CPGs.

Related Experiment Videos