Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Fabrication and Implantation of Miniature Dual-element Strain Gages for Measuring In Vivo Gastrointestinal Contractions in Rodents.
Published on: September 18, 2014
Distribution and characterization of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide binding in canine lower esophageal sphincter
Y K Mao1, Y F Wang, E E Daniel
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) may be a nonadrenergic, noncholinergic inhibitory transmitter in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). There is no biochemical evidence of VIP receptors in the LES.
Methods:
Using membranes from canine LES, VIP receptor distribution and characterization were analyzed by radioligand binding and cross-linking experiments.
Results:
High densities of saturable VIP receptors were found (maximum bound [Bmax], 539.2 fmol/mg in the synaptosome-enriched fraction [P2] and 732.7 fmol/mg in the smooth muscle, plasma membrane-enriched fraction [Mic II]), with high affinity for 125I-VIP (dissociation constant [Kd], 1.38 nmol/L in P2 and 1.40 nmol/L in Mic II). Competition binding studies suggested the presence of two binding sites, a high-affinity (inhibitor constant [Ki1], 0.064 nmol/L) and a low-affinity (Ki2, 2.68 nmol/L) binding site in P2 membranes, but only one binding site (Ki, 1.18 nmol/L) in Mic II membranes. Guanosine triphosphate-gamma-s pretreatment eliminated high-affinity binding in P2 membranes by conversion to binding sites of lower affinity (Ki, 2.82 nmol/L). Studies with a cross-linking agent identified VIP receptors in synaptosomal and smooth muscle plasma membrane fractions; a single polypeptide of approximately 60 kilodaltons was found in each membrane.
Conclusions:
Specific VIP receptors exist in both synaptosomal and smooth muscle plasma membrane of canine LES.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Serotonin Receptor Agonists
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Esophageal Achalasia

