Application of high-performance liquid chromatography for recognition of covalent nucleic acid modification with...

Covalent modification of DNA by antineoplastic agents represents a potent biochemical lesion which can play a major role in drug mechanism of action. The ability to measure levels of DNA covalent modifications in target cells in vivo may, therefore, be seen as the ultimate form of therapeutic drug monitoring. Additionally, elucidation of the structure of critical DNA adducts and definition of their role in tumour cell cytotoxicity will provide more selective targets for rational drug design of new cancer chemotherapeutic agents. High-performance liquid chromatography has contributed significantly to all these areas. In vivo levels of nucleic acid covalent modifications are in the range of 1 in 10(5)-10(8) nucleotides precluding the use of conventional high-performance liquid chromatographic detection methods. Several classes of natural product anticancer drugs have been shown to bond covalently to nucleic acids under optimal laboratory conditions. These have proved more accessible to high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis because of their lipophilicity and strong UV chromophores. However, the majority of experimental evidence to date suggests that with the exception of mitomycin C and morpholino-anthracyclines these compounds do not exert their primary mechanism of action through nucleic acid covalent modification. DNA adducts of alkylating and platinating agents are more difficult to detect by high-performance liquid chromatography and can be chemically unstable. These compounds interact with DNA on the basis of chemical kinetics. Thus, the principle sites of attachment tend to be with the most nucleophilic base (guanine) at its most reactive centre (N-7 position). Limited in vivo high-performance liquid chromatographic studies with all classes of anticancer drugs indicate a much more complex pattern of adductation than would have been anticipated from in vitro studies alone. Some of these differences are probably due to methodological artefacts but these studies stress the need for sensitive detection methods and reliable sample preparation (nucleic acid extraction and digestion techniques) when attempting to determine nucleic acid covalent modifications by anticancer drugs.