Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal encoding as a determinant of blocking

R C Barnet1, N J Grahame, R R Miller

  • 1Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton 13902-6000.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|October 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Plasma and acrosomal membrane lipid content of saltwater crocodile spermatozoa.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2021
Same author

Examining Differences in Recovery Outcomes between Male and Female Hip Fracture Patients: Design and Baseline Results of a Prospective Cohort Study from the Baltimore Hip Studies.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2018
Same author

Multi-site and nasal swabbing for carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: what does a single nose swab predict?

The Journal of hospital infection·2017
Same author

Genetics of gene expression characterizes response to selective breeding for alcohol preference.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2014
Same author

Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Multiple-strain colonization in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2014
Same journal

The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Pigeons use low rather than high spatial frequency information to make visual category discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
Same journal

Associative models of instrumental learning: a response to Dupuis and Dawson.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes·2013
See all related articles

Blocking in rats depends on the timing of conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) pairings. Results support temporal coding, suggesting predictive information isn't essential for blocking.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Learning and Memory
  • Animal Cognition

Background:

  • The blocking effect is a fundamental concept in associative learning, demonstrating how prior associations influence new learning.
  • Previous research often emphasizes the predictive nature of stimuli in forming associations.
  • The role of temporal contiguity in blocking remains an area of active investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether temporal information, specifically simultaneous versus forward associations, influences the blocking effect in rats.
  • To determine if the temporal relationship between conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) is critical for blocking.
  • To test the predictions of the temporal coding hypothesis against alternative explanations.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized a blocking paradigm with rats, involving two phases of conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) pairings.
  • Phase 1 involved pre-training a blocking CS with either simultaneous or forward association to the US.
  • Phase 2 assessed blocking by presenting the pretrained CS in compound with a novel target CS, also paired simultaneously or forward with the US.

Main Results:

  • Forward pretraining led to greater blocking of a forward-trained target CS compared to a simultaneously trained target CS.
  • Simultaneous pretraining resulted in more blocking of a simultaneously trained target CS than a forward-trained target CS.
  • Blocking was more pronounced when the temporal relationship of both the blocking CS and the target CS to the US was consistent.

Conclusions:

  • The findings strongly support the temporal coding hypothesis, indicating that the timing of stimulus associations is a key factor in blocking.
  • The results suggest that the temporal contiguity between stimuli, rather than solely predictive information, may be sufficient to establish blocking.
  • This research challenges the necessity of predictive information as the sole driver of the blocking phenomenon in associative learning.