Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing pulse deficit

E A McConnell

    Nursing
    |November 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary

    Monitoring pulse deficit, the difference between apical and peripheral pulse rates, is crucial for detecting arrhythmias. Irregular pulse rhythms necessitate careful observation of this vital sign.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Communicating to get results: an interview with Jacob Weisberg.

    Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN·2011
    Same author

    High-tech learning means more access, more participation--and more nurses.

    Nursing management·2004
    Same author

    Vital signs' vital integration.

    Nursing management·2004
    Same author

    Clearing the way for a CPR.

    Nursing management·2004
    Same author

    Cost-justifying ED technology.

    Nursing management·2004
    Same author

    New catheters decrease nosocomial infections.

    Nursing management·2004

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Clinical Assessment

    Background:

    • Pulse deficit, the discrepancy between apical and peripheral pulse rates, is a recognized clinical sign.
    • Arrhythmias can lead to a significant pulse deficit, impacting cardiac output.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the importance of monitoring pulse deficit in patients with irregular pulse rhythms.
    • To underscore the diagnostic value of pulse deficit in identifying potential arrhythmias.

    Main Methods:

    • Simultaneous measurement of apical and peripheral pulse rates.
    • Calculation of the pulse deficit by subtracting peripheral rate from apical rate.
    • Clinical observation and correlation with patient's pulse rhythm regularity.

    Main Results:

    • Pulse deficit serves as an indicator of underlying cardiac arrhythmias.
    • Consistent monitoring is essential when a patient exhibits an irregular pulse rhythm.

    Conclusions:

    • Pulse deficit monitoring is a simple yet effective method for early arrhythmia detection.
    • Healthcare providers should routinely assess pulse deficit in at-risk patients.

    Related Experiment Videos