Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effective dose--how effective for patients?

G Drexler1, W Panzer, N Petoussi

  • 1GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Institut für Strahlenschutz, Oberschleissheim, Germany.

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality assurance for the use of computational methods in dosimetry: activities of EURADOS Working Group 6 'Computational Dosimetry'.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2021
Same author

ICRP Publication 145: Adult Mesh-Type Reference Computational Phantoms.

Annals of the ICRP·2020
Same author

ICRP Publication 143: Paediatric Reference Computational Phantoms.

Annals of the ICRP·2020
Same author

An intense source for cold cluster ions of a specific composition.

The Review of scientific instruments·2020
Same author

ICRP Publication 133: The ICRP computational framework for internal dose assessment for reference adults: specific absorbed fractions.

Annals of the ICRP·2018
Same author

New mesh-type phantoms and their dosimetric applications, including emergencies.

Annals of the ICRP·2018
Same journal

Cross-modality validation of quantitative <sup>90</sup>Y imaging using a custom hepatopulmonary shunt phantom and patient data.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2026
Same journal

Correction: Assessment of radiotherapy effect and toxicity using tissue-associated DNA methylation markers in cell-free DNA: a study on prostate cancer.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2026
Same journal

Stereolithography-printed Bi<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-reinforced photopolymer nanocomposite samples with antibacterial and radiation shielding properties.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2026
Same journal

Protective and remineralizing capacity of biosilicate, chitosan-based material, and fluoride on demineralized and irradiated enamel.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2026
Same journal

Methodology for estimating intake from an unknown mixture of radioactive compounds.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the variation of DNA damage response of individual human cells exposed to photon radiation.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2026
See all related articles

Effective dose may not accurately reflect patient risk from radiological procedures. Using it for optimization or risk assessment can be misleading due to simplified biological models and inappropriate weighting factors.

Area of Science:

  • Medical physics
  • Radiological protection
  • Patient dosimetry

Background:

  • Effective dose is a key metric in radiological protection for assessing patient risk.
  • Current methods may oversimplify biological complexities and patient-specific factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the suitability of effective dose for patient risk assessment in radiological procedures.
  • To determine if effective dose can be reliably used for procedure optimization and risk comparison.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the definition and application of effective dose in medical exposures.
  • Critique of the biological mechanisms and weighting factors used in effective dose calculations.
  • Examination of alternative dosimetric quantities for patient exposure assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Effective dose can be misleading or inaccurate for patient risk assessment.
  • Inappropriate simplifications and weighting factors limit the universal applicability of effective dose.
  • The choice of dosimetric quantity is highly situation-dependent.

Conclusions:

  • Effective dose is not always appropriate for reflecting patient risk from radiological procedures.
  • Relying solely on effective dose for optimization and risk estimation may lead to incorrect conclusions.
  • A context-specific approach is necessary when selecting quantities to express patient exposure.