A current view of gastric cancer in the US

In the US, the remarkable decline in the incidence of gastric cancer during the mid-portion of this century has leveled off during the last two decades as an equally remarkable and poorly understood increase in the percentage of the generally more unfavorable cardia cancers has become apparent. The importance of H. pylori infection is being actively investigated and treatment to reduce the infection may offer a means of decreasing the disease, particularly in areas of high incidence. The potential danger of inciting gastric cancer by the prolonged use of drugs that severely reduce or eliminate gastric acid has been mentioned, but the degree of risk must await the passage of years before it can be properly evaluated. "Early gastric cancer" or, probably more appropriately, "superficial gastric adenocarcinoma" continues to comprise a relatively small segment of gastric cancers in the US and most Western countries. Seventeen per cent of cases in the ACS series were classified as stage I, a much higher incidence than reported for early gastric cancer in most individual North American series. The ACS report suggests "special education of the surgeon in the requisites for adequate gastrectomy with node dissection, coupled with effective adjuvant therapy" as a means of improving results in the US. This is a significant consideration because, unfortunately, gastric surgery for ulcer or cancer no longer plays the important role it did in past decades in many US surgical training programs. As has been demonstrated in Japan and in certain larger US series, excellent surgical technique, particularly for cardia tumors, plays an important role in obtaining improved results. The value of radical lymph node dissection continues to be controversial in US cases, and a successful chemotherapeutic regimen has yet to be found. Subtotal gastric resection, as noted in the ACS report, continues to be the procedure of choice in the US for most gastric cancers, even for cardia cancers. Although there is no improvement in survival, quality of life is thought by some to be better after total gastrectomy for cardia cancers rather than proximal subtotal esophagogastrectomy. However, equally important for improved survival is the ACS recommendation of earlier referral for gastric surgery patients with precursor lesions, but the lack of improvement in the pathological stage of disease in the two ACS time periods suggests that little progress is being made in this country in this regard.