Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

'Routine' antenatal care

J Villar1, P Garcia, G Walker

  • 1Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
|October 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blood Pressure Variability Between In-Clinic and At-Home Measurements: Implications for Care Quality Assessment.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2025
Same author

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy associated with Group C Streptococcus septic miscarriage: a case report.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2022
Same author

How we do it: impacted oesophageal foreign body removal using a dilatation balloon.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

Psychological defence mechanisms during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case series.

The European journal of psychiatry·2020
Same author

Neurological improvement predicts clinical outcome after acute basilar artery stroke thrombectomy.

European journal of neurology·2020
Same author

British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the management of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in children and young people, 2018.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same journal

Management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Updates in group prenatal care research.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Complex benign gynecology in perimenopause: current evidence and future directions.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Role of insulin in female reproduction.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Urinary tract involvement in endometriosis: current evidence and clinical insights into navigating diagnosis and management.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Updates in ultrasound imaging of adenomyosis and clinical impacts.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Antenatal care programs show positive effects for maternal health, preventing pregnancy complications. However, observed benefits may be exaggerated due to selection bias in research studies.

Area of Science:

  • Maternal and Child Health
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Obstetrics

Background:

  • Antenatal care serves as a key preventive health model.
  • It targets primary and secondary prevention of pregnancy and delivery complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the effectiveness of antenatal care programs.
  • To identify the impact of care providers on pregnancy outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Critical evaluation of existing antenatal care research.
  • Analysis of reported positive effects and provider influence.
  • Assessment of methodological limitations, including selection bias.

Main Results:

  • Antenatal care programs are generally linked to positive maternal and fetal outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The type of care provider did not show a significant association with these outcomes.
  • Methodological limitations, particularly selection bias, may confound the observed positive results.

    • Conclusions:

    • While antenatal care is beneficial, its precise impact requires further unbiased investigation.
    • Selection bias, where healthier women receive more care, could inflate outcome improvements.
    • Future research should address these limitations to accurately assess antenatal care effectiveness.