Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

05:19
A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
677
Localization of the prostatic apex for radiation therapy using implanted markers
H M Sandler1, R L Bree, P W McLaughlin
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|November 15, 1993
Summary
Implantable radiodense markers accurately localize the prostatic apex. Computed tomography (CT) and retrograde urethrography overestimated the apex extent compared to markers, with CT showing greater accuracy than urethrography.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate localization of the prostatic apex is crucial for various urological procedures.
- Current imaging techniques like computed tomography (CT) and retrograde urethrography have limitations in precisely defining the prostatic apex.
- Implantable markers offer a potential solution for improved anatomical reference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of implantable radiodense markers in localizing the prostatic apex.
- To compare marker-based localization with definitions provided by computed tomography (CT) and retrograde urethrography.
- To assess the relative accuracy of CT versus retrograde urethrography in identifying the prostatic apex.
Main Methods:
- A prospective trial involving 15 patients undergoing pelvic CT, retrograde urethrogram, and transrectal ultrasound with marker placement.
- Three radiodense markers were implanted: one at the prostatic apex and two lateral to the seminal vesicles.
- Measurements were taken to compare the superior-inferior distance between the marker-defined apex and the apex identified by CT and urethrogram.
Main Results:
- Both CT and retrograde urethrography overestimated the inferior extent of the prostatic apex compared to the marker location.
- The average difference from the marker to the CT-defined apex was 0.6 cm.
- The average difference from the marker to the urethrogram-defined apex was 1.3 cm, indicating CT was more accurate.
Conclusions:
- Ultrasound-guided implantation of radiodense markers provides precise prostatic apex localization.
- CT and retrograde urethrography tend to overestimate the inferior boundary of the prostatic apex.
- CT demonstrates higher accuracy than retrograde urethrography for prostatic apex identification.

