Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dysrationalia: a new specific learning disability

K E Stanovich1

  • 1Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada.

Journal of Learning Disabilities
|October 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned?

Annals of dyslexia·2013
Same author

The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability.

Annals of dyslexia·2013
Same author

The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities.

Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Same author

The domain specificity and generality of mental contamination: accuracy and projection in judgments of mental content.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2001
Same author

Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2001
Same author

Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle.

Cognitive psychology·1999
Same journal

Associations Between Self-Reported Literacy and Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Children, Adolescents, and Older Adults.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Learning Disabilities Identification in U.S. Elementary Schools.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Universal Screening of Early Numeracy Skills in Spanish-Speaking Kindergarteners.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

AI Chatbots and Dyslexia: How AI Chatbots Empower Students With Dyslexia to Master Arithmetic Word Problems.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Instructional Decision-Making for Students With Intensive Early Writing Needs: Student Growth in Sentence-Level Curriculum-Based Measurement.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Effects of Calculation and Reading Fluency Interventions Focusing on Awareness and Adaptive Use of Strategies: Supporting Children With Comorbid Fluency Problems.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
See all related articles

Learning disability definitions often rely on intelligence (IQ) tests, potentially overlooking other cognitive skills. This paper proposes a new discrepancy-based disability category to encourage a broader view of intelligence in learning disabilities.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Selective deficit is central to learning disability definitions.
  • Current definitions often link learning disabilities to intelligence (IQ) test scores and aptitude-achievement discrepancies.
  • The field is re-evaluating its reliance on psychometrically defined intelligence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the role of psychometric intelligence in defining learning disabilities.
  • To propose a novel discrepancy-based disability category.
  • To advocate for a more comprehensive understanding of intelligence in learning disability conceptualization.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of intelligence and learning disability definitions.
  • Critique of discrepancy-based models reliant on IQ testing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposal and defense of a new discrepancy-based disability category.

    • Main Results:

    • Discrepancy-based definitions' prevalence is influenced by the scope of IQ tests.
    • Psychometric intelligence measures capture a limited aspect of cognition compared to the vernacular concept.
    • A new discrepancy-based disability category is proposed.

    Conclusions:

    • Rethinking the definition of learning disabilities is necessary.
    • A broader conceptualization of intelligence is needed for accurate learning disability identification.
    • The proposed disability category highlights limitations in current diagnostic frameworks.