Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Comments on simulation and experts. A contribution from forensic practice]

L Mewe1

  • 1Augenärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis, Greven.

Versicherungsmedizin
|October 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

A private accident and health insurance patient feigned a concussion and vision loss to defraud a hospital. This expert analysis details how the malingerer was easily identified and proven guilty.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Forensic problems in the evaluation of lens damage in legal compensation].

Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·1985
Same author

[Disability in eye diseases].

Lebensversicherungs Medizin·1983
Same author

[Legal assessment of traumatic cataract for insurance purposes].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·1982
Same author

[Assessment of eye damage for private accident insurance].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·1982
Same author

[Expert ophthalmologic testimony in insurance cases].

Bucherei des Augenarztes·1982
Same author

[The prognostic significance of retinometer studies].

Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·1982

Area of Science:

  • Medical Malpractice
  • Forensic Medicine
  • Insurance Fraud

Background:

  • A case study involving a private accident and health insurance policyholder.
  • The patient alleged a concussion leading to severe vision impairment.
  • The patient sought substantial insurance payouts based on claimed disability.