Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing empirical research in bioethics

B A Brody1

  • 1Center for Ethics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.

Theoretical Medicine
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Empirical research in bioethics can identify issues and assess consequences. However, it may fail when ethical problems are non-consequentialist or when key consequences are overlooked, as seen in kidney donor programs and ICU bed allocation studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethics and methods in surgical trials.

Journal of medical ethics·2009
Same author

Making informed consent meaningful.

IRB·2003
Same author

Placebos in clinical trials: new forms of an old issue.

Health law news. University of Houston. Health Law and Policy Institute·2003
Same author

Effects of storage and viral load on hepatitis C viral genotyping.

Journal of clinical laboratory analysis·2002
Same author

The prevalence of female genital operations in the Houston metropolitan area.

Texas medicine·2001
Same author

A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research.

The New England journal of medicine·2000

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Empirical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Empirical research offers valuable insights for ethical reflection in bioethics.
  • It aids in identifying ethical issues, understanding current resolutions, and evaluating their consequences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the potential and limitations of empirical research in bioethical reflection.
  • To highlight instances where empirical research may be misused or inadequate.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing bioethical literature and empirical studies.
  • Analysis of case examples including commercialized living kidney donor programs, ICU bed allocation, and physician deception.

Main Results:

  • Empirical research can be misused when ethical issues are fundamentally non-consequentialist.
  • In consequentialist ethical dilemmas, empirical research may fail if it does not adequately address crucial consequences.
  • Case studies illustrate these limitations, showing that even if negative consequences are resolved, core ethical issues may persist.

Conclusions:

  • Empirical research is a tool that must be applied judiciously in bioethics.
  • Researchers must ensure that their studies address the appropriate ethical dimensions, whether consequentialist or non-consequentialist, to avoid misinterpretation or incomplete ethical analysis.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsEmpirical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos