Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing and using cognitive task typologies

T W van der Schaaf1

  • 1Eindhoven University of Technology, Graduate School of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Department of Technology and Work, The Netherlands.

Ergonomics
|November 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

If only....: failed, missed and absent error recovery opportunities in medication errors.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same author

Feasibility and reliability of PRISMA-medical for specialty-based incident analysis.

Quality & safety in health care·2009
Same author

Prospective risk analysis of health care processes: a systematic evaluation of the use of HFMEA in Dutch health care.

Ergonomics·2009
Same author

Specialty-based, voluntary incident reporting in neonatal intensive care: description of 4846 incident reports.

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition·2008
Same author

Error recovery in a hospital pharmacy.

Ergonomics·2006
Same author

Medical applications of industrial safety science.

Quality & safety in health care·2002
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Developing a cognitive task typology model aids in comparing, predicting, and designing tasks across different environments. This model can be built using methods like hierarchical task analysis and considering operator mental models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Developing a standardized cognitive task typology is crucial for understanding and analyzing diverse tasks.
  • Existing methods offer partial solutions, but a comprehensive model is needed for practical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present preliminary thoughts on the development of a cognitive task typology model.
  • To outline practical functions (comparison, prediction, design) of such a typology.
  • To explore suitable techniques and approaches for building the typology.

Main Methods:

  • Case study experiences informing the conceptualization of the typology.
  • Review of existing techniques: hierarchical task analysis, verbal protocols, elementary cognitive modules.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Outlining two approaches for identifying task dimensions: macro-ergonomic and mental model-centric.
  • Main Results:

    • Identified three key functions for a cognitive task typology: comparison, prediction, and design.
    • Suggested suitability of hierarchical task analysis, verbal protocols, and elementary cognitive modules.
    • Proposed two overlapping approaches for defining task dimensions.

    Conclusions:

    • Advocates for a bottom-up strategy in developing cognitive task typologies.
    • Highlights the importance of considering task complexity in typology development.
    • Emphasizes the utility of a cognitive task typology for analyzing and designing tasks in various domains.