Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Workshop summary: screening policies and procedures

G W Chodak1, J Trachtenberg, L J Denis

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Ill.

European Urology
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Prostate Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic: a biopsychosocial clinic for sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2019
Same author

Enablers and barriers in delivery of a cancer exercise program: the Canadian experience.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2015
Same author

Evaluation of models predicting insignificant prostate cancer to select men for active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2015
Same author

The impact of a BRCA2 mutation on mortality from screen-detected prostate cancer.

British journal of cancer·2014
Same author

A pilot 'window of opportunity' neoadjuvant study of metformin in localised prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2014
Same author

Effect of total-body prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Physiotherapy·2014
Same journal

Diagnosis and Staging of Patients with Prostate Cancer: Report from the 2025 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) Diagnostics.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Twelve-month Results from the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-sparing Therapy for Recurrent High-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recurrent High-risk NMIBC: One Bladder, Choose Wisely.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Dries Develtere, Riccardo Bertolo. Cumulative Genitourinary Toxicity After Prostate Radiotherapy: High-Level Long-Term Randomized Evidence. J Clin Oncol. Online ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO-26-00436.

European urology·2026
Same journal

In Memory of Paul Mitrofanoff (1934-2025).

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: McKay RR, Pal S, Xie W, et al. Advanced Urologic Cancer Consensus Conference (AUC3) 2025: Expert Consensus on the Management of Renal Cell and Urinary Tract Cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2026;76:e70052.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Ultra-hypofractionated Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: 5-year Outcomes from a Pooled Analysis of the FASTRACK Trials.

European urology·2026
See all related articles

Prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is debated. Key questions involve routine screening, optimal age, and long-term patient benefits from early detection.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • The introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has made prostate cancer screening a contentious issue in men's health.
  • Significant debate exists regarding the efficacy and necessity of widespread prostate cancer screening protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address critical questions surrounding prostate cancer screening, including its routine implementation.
  • To determine the appropriate age for initiating screening and evaluate the long-term benefits of early prostate cancer detection.

Main Methods:

  • A discussion forum format was employed to explore the complexities of prostate cancer screening.
  • Expert panelists engaged in a debate, presenting various viewpoints on the outlined screening issues.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The forum highlighted the ongoing controversy and key considerations in prostate cancer screening strategies.
  • Discussion points focused on the integration of screening into routine healthcare, age recommendations, and patient outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The debate underscores the need for careful consideration of the benefits and drawbacks of prostate cancer screening.
  • Further discussion and research are warranted to establish optimal screening guidelines for prostate cancer.