Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Problems in the case for psychotherapeutic integration

W O'Donohue1, M McKelvie

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb 60115-2892.

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
|June 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

This study critically evaluates therapeutic integration, finding that claims of equal therapy effectiveness and common elements are unsubstantiated. It highlights significant weaknesses in the arguments supporting widespread integration in psychotherapy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sexual harassment.

Annual review of sex research·2001
Same author

Are we ready for this classification system?

Journal of sex & marital therapy·2001
Same author

Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia.

Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment·2000
Same author

Characteristics of empirically supported treatments.

The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2000
Same author

What is a delusion? Epistemological dimensions.

Journal of abnormal psychology·1999
Same author

Sexual assault prevention programs: current issues, future directions, and the potential efficacy of interventions with women.

Clinical psychology review·1999
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • Therapeutic integration is a growing trend in psychotherapy.
  • Arguments for integration often assume equal efficacy and shared core components across diverse therapeutic modalities.
  • The philosophical and historical underpinnings of scientific progress in therapy are frequently overlooked.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the arguments supporting therapeutic integration.
  • To identify and analyze the weaknesses in the theoretical and empirical basis of therapeutic integration.
  • To examine the validity of claims regarding common elements and the role of cognitive therapy as a meta-language.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and critical analysis of existing literature on therapeutic integration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of logical coherence and empirical support for claims made by proponents of integration.
  • Historical and philosophical examination of scientific paradigms in psychotherapy.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified eight key weaknesses in the arguments for therapeutic integration.
    • Challenged the assertion that all therapies are equally effective.
    • Found a lack of clear definitions for therapeutic legitimacy and common elements.
    • Critiqued the evidence for integration trends and the purported neutrality of cognitive therapy.
    • Highlighted misunderstandings in the history and philosophy of science as applied to psychotherapy.

    Conclusions:

    • The current arguments for therapeutic integration are based on flawed premises and inadequate evidence.
    • Significant conceptual and empirical gaps exist in the justification for widespread therapeutic integration.
    • A more rigorous approach, informed by the philosophy of science, is needed to advance understanding of therapeutic efficacy and integration.