Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities

H S Kurtzman1, M C MacDonald

  • 1Division of Neuroscience and Behavioral Science, National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD 20857.

Cognition
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Climate adaptation for rural water and sanitation systems in the Solomon Islands: A community scale systems model for decision support.

The Science of the total environment·2020
Same author

Characterization and ontogenesis of N-methyl-d-aspartate-evoked luteinizing hormone secretion in immature female rats.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2011
Same author

The contribution of Yale University School of Medicine to the Connecticut cancer program.

Connecticut state medical journal·2010
Same author

Successful pregnancy and delivery following a Malone antegrade continence enema procedure.

Techniques in coloproctology·2009
Same author

Occurrence of the Clover Cyst Nematode, Heterodera trifolii, in Prince Edward Island Soils.

Journal of nematology·2009
Same author

Diagnostic challenges in extrauterine epithelioid trophoblastic tumours: a report of two cases.

Gynecologic oncology·2007
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study explores how people resolve sentence ambiguities, finding that multiple structural principles interact, rather than a single rule, to determine meaning. Linear order of phrases has minimal impact on interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Quantifier scope ambiguity is a common challenge in sentence processing.
  • Previous research proposed various principles, including structural and linear order, to explain ambiguity resolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of structural principles in resolving quantifier scope ambiguities.
  • To determine which principles best explain human preferences in interpreting ambiguous sentences.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed speeded judgments on discourse continuation tasks for sentences with quantifier scope ambiguity.
  • Three grammatical constructions were analyzed to test specific structural principles.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Interpretation preferences were not explained by any single structural principle.
  • An interaction of multiple structural principles was necessary to account for the observed data.
  • Linear order of phrases had minimal influence on scope interpretation, contrary to some theories.

Conclusions:

  • Ambiguity resolution likely involves parallel consideration of interpretations, with selection based on principle satisfaction.
  • The findings support a model where multiple linguistic factors interact dynamically.
  • This research contributes to understanding ambiguity resolution across different linguistic levels.