Practice patterns and the adequacy of residency training in consultation medicine

To describe consultation practice patterns of graduates of an internal medicine residency program and to determine whether they consider themselves to be adequately trained to practice in the area of internal medicine consultations.

The authors surveyed graduates of the internal medicine residency program at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine from 1980 to 1989. Respondents described their practice types and the mechanics of consultations they currently perform, as well as the adequacy of their training in and frequency of encountering 74 clinical problems in the area of internal medicine consultation. Topics were categorized as Group I: excessive training; Group II: adequate training, frequently encountered; Group III: adequate training, infrequently encountered; Group IV: inadequate training, frequently encountered; and Group V: inadequate training, infrequently encountered.

University teaching hospital.

Of 214 graduates, 91 returned surveys adequate for analysis.

Internists prefer verbal communication with their colleagues and seeing surgical patients in the office prior to admission. Residents perceive that they have been excessively trained in preoperative evaluations of the asymptomatic and chronically ill adult and in several postoperative complications. Topics seen frequently in clinical practice but inadequately taught include: issues in convalescence and rehabilitation from surgical procedures, use of psychotropic medications, and management of eating disorders.

To prepare residents for practice, program directors in consultation medicine might consider incorporating outpatient preoperative evaluation assessments, encouraging a liaison between surgeons and internists, and modeling verbal communication among colleagues. Consideration should be given for more didactic training for Group IV topics.