Related Experiment Videos
The ethics of letting go
1Department of Medical Humanities, Loyola University Chicago Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153.
Journal of Critical Care
|September 1, 1993
Summary
Medical training prioritizes life extension, leading to debates on right-to-die and euthanasia. A balanced approach focuses on preserving human function and patient values, allowing therapy withdrawal when misaligned with life goals.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Geriatric Medicine
- Palliative Care
Background:
- Current medical training and practice in the US emphasize life prolongation at all costs.
- Advanced medical technology makes it challenging to cease life-sustaining treatments.
- Societal discourse includes the
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a shift in medical focus from solely physiological function to preserving human function and patient values.
- To provide a framework for withholding and withdrawing therapies based on patient life goals.
- To address the ethical considerations of end-of-life care, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of current medical training and end-of-life care practices.
- Ethical deliberation on the balance between life extension and quality of life.
- Exploration of patient-centered care models that incorporate life plans and values.
Main Results:
- A proposed approach shifts focus to maintaining human function and respecting patient values.
- Therapies can be ethically withheld or withdrawn when they conflict with a patient's life goals.
- The need for parallel development of therapeutic goals and societal values regarding quality of life is highlighted.
Conclusions:
- A rational approach to end-of-life care involves preserving human function and aligning treatment with patient values.
- Caution is necessary to prevent potential abuses, especially for vulnerable individuals.
- Integrating global societal values on quality of life is crucial for developing appropriate therapeutic goals.