Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone age, mineral density, and fatigue damage

A M Parfitt1

  • 1Henry Ford Hospital, Bone and Mineral Research Laboratory, Detroit, Michigan 48202.

Calcified Tissue International
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how bone remodeling prevents excessive aging and reduces the risk of fatigue microdamage. The researchers developed a mathematical model to predict bone age based on two factors: the probability of remodeling starting on the nearest bone surface and the likelihood of a remodeling event penetrating to a certain depth. The model suggests that within 40 microns of the surface, surface remodeling is the main determinant of bone age. Beyond 75 microns, bone becomes isolated from surface remodeling. When applied to subjects with and without vertebral fractures, the model found that fracture patients had a higher proportion of bone with a mean age over 20 years compared to controls. The study also found that prolonged bone age correlates with higher mineral density, as observed through electron microscopy. These findings suggest that bone remodeling plays a crucial role in maintaining skeletal health and preventing fractures.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanical stimulation prevents osteocyte apoptosis: requirement of integrins, Src kinases, and ERKs.

American journal of physiology. Cell physiology·2005
Same author

Life history of osteocytes: relationship to bone age, bone remodeling, and bone fragility.

Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions·2005
Same author

What is the normal rate of bone remodeling?

Bone·2004
Same author

The mineralization index--a new approach to the histomorphometric appraisal of osteomalacia.

Bone·2004
Same author

The attainment of peak bone mass: what is the relationship between muscle growth and bone growth?

Bone·2004
Same author

Large calcium fluxes that are not related to remodeling exist.

Bone·2003

Area of Science:

  • Skeletal biology within biomedical engineering
  • Bone regeneration research in clinical physiology
  • Fatigue mechanics in materials science

Background:

Understanding how bone adapts to mechanical stress is essential for addressing age-related skeletal deterioration. Prior research has shown that bone undergoes continuous remodeling to maintain structural integrity. However, the exact relationship between remodeling frequency and bone aging remains unclear. No prior work had resolved how surface proximity influences bone age distribution. This uncertainty drove the development of a mathematical framework to model bone aging dynamics. The model aims to clarify how surface remodeling affects the likelihood of microdamage accumulation. By integrating activation frequency and penetration depth, the model provides a novel approach to predicting bone age. This gap motivated the study to explore how surface proximity correlates with bone aging and susceptibility to fractures.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study was to investigate how bone remodeling prevents excessive aging and reduces the risk of fatigue microdamage. The researchers focused on two key factors: activation frequency and penetration depth of remodeling events. These variables determine the age distribution of bone tissue. By developing a mathematical model, the team sought to quantify how surface proximity influences bone age. The study also aimed to assess how bone age correlates with mineral density and fracture risk. This approach allows for a more precise understanding of bone aging mechanisms. The researchers proposed that prolonged bone age could increase mineral density in osteoporotic patients. This study provides a framework for evaluating how remodeling patterns affect skeletal health.

Keywords:
bone remodelingfatigue microdamagemineral densityosteoporosis

Frequently Asked Questions

The model suggests that remodeling prevents aging by replacing older bone tissue with newer material, reducing the risk of microdamage and osteocyte death.

The model combines activation frequency and penetration depth of remodeling events to predict bone age distribution based on proximity to the nearest bone surface.

The model indicates that beyond 75 microns from the surface, the probability of remodeling events penetrating to that depth becomes negligible, effectively isolating the bone from surface remodeling.

Mineral density distribution was determined using scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electron imaging, calibrated in terms of atomic number.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The researchers constructed a mathematical model to simulate bone aging based on two probabilities: activation frequency and penetration depth of remodeling events. The model integrates these variables to predict bone age distribution. Surface proximity was divided into zones based on distance from the nearest bone surface. The model predicted that within 40 microns, surface remodeling dominates bone age. Beyond 40 microns, penetration depth becomes a more significant factor. The model was applied to subjects with and without vertebral fractures. Bone age was calculated for iliac cancellous bone samples. Scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electron imaging was used to determine mineral density distribution.

Main Results:

The model predicted that bone age is primarily determined by surface remodeling within 40 microns of the nearest bone surface. Beyond 40 microns, penetration depth increasingly influences bone age. At 75 microns, bone becomes isolated from surface remodeling. In control subjects without fractures, less than 20% of iliac cancellous bone had a mean age over 20 years. In contrast, one-third of fracture patients had more than 20% of bone with a mean age over 20 years. Bone age was found to correlate with mineral density distribution. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed higher mineral density in older bone regions. These findings suggest that prolonged bone age may increase true mineral density in osteoporotic patients.

Conclusions:

The mathematical model proposed in this study suggests that bone age is determined by surface proximity and remodeling frequency. The findings indicate that bone beyond 75 microns is isolated from surface remodeling. The model also shows that prolonged bone age is associated with higher mineral density. In fracture patients, a higher proportion of bone with a mean age over 20 years was observed. These results support the hypothesis that bone remodeling prevents excessive aging and reduces microdamage risk. The study highlights the importance of surface proximity in determining bone age distribution. The researchers propose that prolonged bone age may increase true mineral density in osteoporotic patients. These conclusions align with the model's predictions and observed mineral density patterns.

The study found that prolonged bone age in osteoporotic patients correlates with higher true mineral density, as observed through electron microscopy.

The model shows that in fracture patients, a higher proportion of bone with a mean age over 20 years was observed compared to control subjects without fractures.