Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays

S J O'Neal1, R L Miracle, K F Leinfelder

  • 1School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Direct fill posterior composite resin has limitations, leading to the development of resin or ceramic inlays/onlays. This study examined the wear rates of luting agents used with these restorations, identifying key factors influencing cement wear.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin.

Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)·2010
Same author

Impression materials: a new look at the polyether system.

Dentistry today·2003
Same author

Wear resistance of resin systems.

Dentistry today·2003
Same author

Glass ionomers revisited.

Dentistry today·2003
Same author

Developments in indirect resin composite materials.

Dentistry today·2003
Same author

A new composite resin cement: report of a case.

Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)·2002

Area of Science:

  • Restorative Dentistry
  • Dental Materials Science

Background:

  • Direct-fill posterior composite resins present clinical inadequacies.
  • Inlays/onlays using resin or ceramic materials offer an alternative restorative approach.
  • Luting agents are crucial for the success of indirect restorations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the wear rates of various luting agents.
  • To compare luting agent wear in conjunction with resin and ceramic restorative systems.
  • To identify factors influencing the wear of cementing agents in indirect dental restorations.

Main Methods:

  • Clinical investigation of wear rates.
  • Utilized both resin and ceramic restorative systems.
  • Analysis of multiple luting agent types.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The wear rate of luting agents varied significantly.
  • Specific factors influencing cement wear were identified.
  • Performance differences were observed between resin and ceramic-associated luting agents.

Conclusions:

  • Luting agent selection is critical for the longevity of indirect posterior restorations.
  • Understanding wear factors can guide material choice and clinical practice.
  • Further research into wear resistance of luting agents is warranted.