Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison between cell motion analyser, autosperm, and conventional semen analysis

P Kamtchouing1, L Vermeulen, F Schoonjans

  • 1Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium.

Andrologia
|November 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Computer-assisted semen analysis methods show discrepancies. The Autosperm system (AS) offers reproducible results, correlating better with the manual method than the Cell Motion Analyzer (CMA).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Poor-prognosis young-onset colorectal cancer is defined by the mesenchymal subtype and can be predicted by integrating molecular and histopathological characteristics.

ESMO gastrointestinal oncology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of potential biomarkers during irinotecan-based systemic treatment for colorectal cancer-study protocol of the OPTIMA study.

BMC cancer·2025
Same author

Peritoneal resident macrophages constitute an immunosuppressive environment in peritoneal metastasized colorectal cancer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Medical imaging and radiation science students' use of artificial intelligence for learning and assessment.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2024
Same author

Analysis of Sinus Variability in a Group of Cameroonian Athletes.

Journal of sports medicine (Hindawi Publishing Corporation)·2024
Same author

Behavioral factors to modulate immunotherapy efficacy in cancer.

Frontiers in immunology·2023

Area of Science:

  • Andrology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Medical Technology Evaluation

Background:

  • Semen analysis is crucial for male fertility assessment.
  • Computer-assisted methods aim to improve accuracy and efficiency over manual techniques.
  • Controversy exists regarding the reliability of different automated semen analysis systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of a fully automated cell motion analyzer (CMA) and a semi-computerized autosperm system (AS) against the conventional manual semen analysis method.
  • To investigate discrepancies in sperm concentration and motility measurements between automated and manual methods.
  • To evaluate the reproducibility and correlation of sperm velocity characteristics between CMA and AS.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative study involving three methods: Cell Motion Analyzer (CMA), Autosperm system (AS), and conventional manual semen analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of sperm concentration, motility, and velocity characteristics.
  • Statistical correlation analysis between the methods.

    • Main Results:

    • CMA yielded higher sperm concentration values than the average, while the conventional method yielded lower values.
    • The conventional method overestimated sperm motility, whereas CMA underestimated it.
    • Significant correlation was found between CMA and AS for sperm velocity, but explained only 18% of variability.
    • The Autosperm system (AS) demonstrated better reproducibility and stronger correlation with the manual method.

    Conclusions:

    • Discrepancies exist between automated and manual semen analysis methods, particularly in sperm concentration and motility.
    • The Autosperm system (AS) shows promise due to its reproducibility and better correlation with the WHO-recommended manual method.
    • Further investigation into the algorithms of automated systems like CMA is needed to address measurement variability.