Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data

T Adera1, A M Donahue, B D Malit

  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814-4799.

Military Medicine
|November 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and preterm births.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2007
Same author

Global network could avert pandemics.

Nature·2006
Same author

Evaluation of PCR testing of ethanol-fixed nasal swab specimens as an augmented surveillance strategy for influenza virus and adenovirus identification.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2005
Same author

Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2003
Same author

Geographic epidemiology of gonorrhoea and chlamydia on a large military installation: application of a GIS system.

Sexually transmitted infections·2002
Same author

Features of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in male Army recruits.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2001
Same journal

Impact of Intradermal Fixation on Epidural Catheter Durability and Dislodgement Rates.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

Bridging the Military-Academic Medicine Divide: The Value, Evaluate, and Train Strategic Framework for Physician Workforce Development.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

A Scoping Review of Orexin Antagonists in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Modulating Sleep, Stress, and Fear Circuits.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

Human Performance Optimization in Special Operations Forces: Structure, Outcomes, and Readiness Implications.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

Mindfulness in Military Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Army Medical Specialist Corps Officers' Mindfulness Competency, Beliefs, and Tendencies.

Military medicine·2026
Same journal

Comorbidity of Nightmares in U.S. Military Personnel With Insomnia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, or Co-Morbid Insomnia and Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Military medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces an epidemiologic method to evaluate hearing conservation programs (HCPs). The new approach found a nearly 3-fold increased risk of hearing loss in the study population compared to a reference group.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational health
  • Epidemiology
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Hearing conservation programs (HCPs) require audiometric monitoring, generating vast datasets.
  • Current methods for assessing HCP effectiveness using audiometric data are limited.
  • There is a need for novel approaches to evaluate the efficacy of hearing conservation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate an epidemiologic method for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs.
  • To compare the risk of developing hearing loss between a study population and a reference population.
  • To offer an alternative to existing methods for HCP evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • An epidemiologic risk comparison method was employed.
  • The risk of standard threshold shift (hearing loss) was calculated.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A risk ratio was used to compare the study population against a reference population.

    • Main Results:

    • The study population exhibited a nearly 3-fold increased risk of developing hearing loss.
    • The risk ratio indicated a significantly higher incidence of hearing loss in the exposed group.
    • The findings highlight potential deficiencies in the current hearing conservation program.

    Conclusions:

    • Epidemiologic risk comparison methods provide a viable alternative for evaluating HCP effectiveness.
    • Utilizing reference populations offers a robust framework for analyzing audiometric data.
    • This method can enhance the assessment of hearing conservation program outcomes.