Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence that GHN phase bias does not constitute a framing code

J F Curran1, B L Gross

  • 1Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.

Journal of Molecular Biology
|January 7, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oxford radiographic chart of foreign bodies.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2018
Same author

Current and future practices in surgical retraction.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2013
Same author

Genetic and phenotypic divergence of homoploid hybrid species from parental species.

Heredity·2011
Same author

The molecular basis of white pericarps in African domesticated rice: novel mutations at the Rc gene.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2010
Same author

Co-existent primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube and of the breast.

The New England journal of medicine·2010
Same author

The ecological genetics of homoploid hybrid speciation.

The Journal of heredity·2004
Same journal

UPF3A and UPF3B shape the transcriptome cooperatively yet oppose cell function.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Antibody-secreting cells integrate efficient NMD with non‑canonical UPR signaling to maintain proteostasis and support massive immunoglobulin synthesis.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Small molecule stabilization of diverse amyloidogenic immunoglobulin light chains revealed by hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same journal

UPF1 at Work: Structural and Mechanistic Insights Into a Master Regulator of Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Structural basis for the pro-amyloidogenic action and ligand binding of a novel W72R variant of human apolipoprotein A-I.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same journal

Cryo-EM Structure of the C. Elegans Septin Tetramer Reveals a Revised Architecture and Conserved Positional Orthology.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
See all related articles

The G-nonG-N (GHN) phase bias in DNA sequences does not appear to maintain the correct reading frame during protein synthesis. Studies show no significant effect on frameshifting accuracy or ribosomal frameshifting tendencies.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • A triplet repeat pattern, the G-nonG-N (GHN) phase bias, is hypothesized to play a role in maintaining the correct reading frame during protein synthesis.
  • Understanding reading frame maintenance is crucial for accurate gene expression and protein function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the framing function of the GHN phase bias in coding sequences.
  • To determine if GHN bias influences reading frame accuracy and ribosomal frameshifting.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a highly GHN-biased DNA sequence using sensitive frameshift assays.
  • Comparison of the GHN phase with alternative overlapping phases (HNG, NGH) for accuracy.
  • Investigation of ribosomal frameshifting tendencies from alternative frames into the GHN phase.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of programmed frameshift sites in Escherichia coli.
  • Main Results:

    • No significant effects on reading frame maintenance were observed, even with sensitive assays.
    • The GHN phase demonstrated no greater accuracy than alternative phases (HNG, NGH).
    • Ribosomes did not show a significant tendency to shift into the GHN phase from other frames.
    • Analysis of E. coli programmed frameshift sites did not support a role for GHN bias in programmed frameshifting.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed framing function of GHN phase bias in protein synthesis is not supported by experimental evidence.
    • Any framing roles for GHN phase bias, if they exist, appear to be extremely limited.
    • The study challenges the hypothesis of GHN bias as a significant framemaintenance mechanism.