Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for creating a simple database

A L Harroff1, M A France, J R Hayes

  • 1Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205.

M.D. Computing : Computers in Medical Practice
|November 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The IMAP-Ultra Energetic Neutral Atom (ENA) Imager.

Space science reviews·2025
Same author

Observations on the Febrile Movement in Disease: An Essay Read before the Rock Island Co. Medical Society, and Published at Their Requst, April 14th, 1858.

The Chicago medical journal·2023
Same author

Nasal Polypi Cured with One Dose of Aurum-M,<sup>50m</sup>.

The Homoeopathic physician·2023
Same author

High spatial-density, cladding-pumped 6-mode 7-core fiber amplifier for C-band operation.

Optics express·2021
Same author

Low-loss Kagome hollow-core fibers operating from the near- to the mid-IR.

Optics letters·2017
Same author

Optoelectronic oscillator incorporating hollow-core photonic bandgap fiber.

Optics letters·2017
Same journal

A clean slate: initiating a graduate program in health informatics.

M.D. computing : computers in medical practice·2001
Same journal

Drugs, codes, standards, and other incompatible things in the dark.

M.D. computing : computers in medical practice·2001
Same journal

Ambulatory care. Implementing an integrated clinical and practice management system.

M.D. computing : computers in medical practice·2001
Same journal

Currents in medical informatics. The Woods Hole experience.

M.D. computing : computers in medical practice·2001
Same journal

Computer telephony integration. Bringing together a host of new applications for healthcare.

M.D. computing : computers in medical practice·2001
Same journal

eHealthcareWorld 2000. Getting down to business.

M.D. computing : computers in medical practice·2001
See all related articles

Simple flat file programs offer ease of use and flexibility for departmental databases. While they have limitations like data duplication, enhanced flat file systems and relational databases are improving accessibility for novice users.

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Information Management

Background:

  • Flat file programs offer simplicity and user control over design, making them easy and inexpensive for departmental database needs.
  • Traditional flat file systems present challenges, including data redundancy and limitations in report formatting due to menu-driven interfaces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the advantages and limitations of simple flat file programs in database management.
  • To explore the evolving landscape of database management systems, including advancements in flat file and relational database technologies.
  • To guide users in leveraging simple systems for efficient information management and increased productivity.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of flat file program capabilities versus relational database systems.
  • Discussion of user experience and learning curves associated with different database approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of system simplicity, flexibility, and potential for data duplication.

    • Main Results:

    • Flat file programs provide intuitive data handling for novices, enabling quick information entry and retrieval without complex structural understanding.
    • Advancements are making flat file systems more robust, with some adopting relational characteristics.
    • Relational databases are becoming more user-friendly, offering solutions to flat file limitations like data duplication.

    Conclusions:

    • Simple flat file systems remain a viable and productive tool, especially for users who benefit from straightforward data management.
    • The choice between flat file and relational databases depends on user expertise and specific data management requirements.
    • Prioritizing system simplicity enhances user understanding and computer-aided productivity.