Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selecting an interim analysis procedure

J E Overall1, R S Atlas

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77225.

Psychopharmacology Bulletin
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CLUSTER ORIENTED FACTOR SOLUTIONS: OBLIQUE POWERED VECTOR FACTOR ANALYSIS.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Common Misconceptions Concerning The Analysis Of Covariance.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

MARKER VARIABLE FACTOR ANALYSIS: A REGIONAL PRINCIPAL AXES SOLUTION.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

FACTOR STRUCTURE O F THE MMPI IN A PSYCHIATRIC POPULATION.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

An Investigation Of The Consistency Of Diagnostic Concepts Among Five Child And Adolescent Psychiatrists.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Lever-pressing behavior of albino rats during prolonged exposures to x-radiation.

Project report. USAF School of Aviation Medicine·2014

This study compares five interim analysis methods for clinical trials, evaluating their performance in early trial stopping. Results aid researchers in selecting appropriate methods based on specific study needs and statistical criteria.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Interim analyses in clinical trials serve various purposes, with diverse methodologies proposed.
  • Different procedures address specific statistical concerns, such as confirming or refuting a true treatment effect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate five distinct interim analysis procedures.
  • To compare these methods based on differing statistical requirements and research objectives.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computer program to simulate the application of interim analysis procedures to sampling data.
  • Compared Type I error probabilities, power, early termination probabilities, and expected sample sizes.
  • Considered one-sided and two-sided tests, varied sample segment sizes, and design modifications.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Procedures varied in their criteria for accepting the null hypothesis (Ho) or rejecting Ho.
  • Simulations provided quantitative comparisons of statistical performance metrics.
  • The study analyzed the impact of different testing strategies and sample size adjustments.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of interim analysis method significantly impacts trial outcomes, including error rates and sample size.
  • Results offer guidance for selecting the most suitable interim analysis procedure based on specific research goals and statistical considerations.