Early experience with minimally invasive surgery: a New Zealand audit

The clinical and economic impact of minimally invasive surgery in New Zealand, especially laparoscopic cholecystectomy, has been profound but uncharted. A postal questionnaire was sent to all general surgeons in New Zealand (n = 214), in order to document the current levels of experience, adequacy of training, levels of equipment and sources of funding. In the case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, further details were obtained relating to operative technique, complication rates and approaches to the management of choledocholithiasis. The response rate was 71%. From 27 centres, 71 of 106 active general surgeons were performing minimally invasive surgery. Of the 34 different procedures audited, cholecystectomy (3056), herniorrhaphy (178), and appendicectomy (141) were performed most often. Primary funding came from Area Health Boards (71%) and private hospital funds (25%) with 4% coming from other sources. Ten different camera/insufflator systems were used. Training was perceived to be adequate by the majority of surgeons (89%), although seven surgeons had received no specific training. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy technique included: prophylactic antibiotics (89% of surgeons), patients supine (80%), wound infiltration (80%), routine use of diathermy within triangle of Calot (36%) and a routine peritoneal drain (13%). Routine operative cholangiography was used rarely (7%) and 72% of surgeons had deliberately changed their policy with respect to its use. Twenty-two cases of laparoscopic biliary injury were identified by the survey, none of whom had operative cholangiography. The conversion rate was 13% for acute and 4% for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This survey indicated the broad scope of minimally invasive surgery that is being undertaken, and highlights potentially important variations in surgical practice.