Formation of multiple complexes between actinomycin D and a DNA hairpin: structural characterization by multinuclear...

The solution conformations of a DNA oligomer and its complexes with the anticancer drug actinomycin D (ActD) were characterized using homo- and heteronuclear NMR techniques. Previous high-resolution NMR investigations of ActD-DNA complexes employed symmetric double-stranded DNA oligomers, yielding two identical symmetry-related complexes. In order to understand the important effects that neighboring base pairs and/or unusual nucleic acid structures may have on ActD binding specificity and orientation, we chose to study the oligonucleotide d(TCGCGTTTTCGCGA), which adopts a hairpin structure in solution. NOE cross-peak intensities were used to generate distance constraints for molecular dynamics simulations and structure determinations of the free oligonucleotide and for both complexes. A total of 86 intermolecular NOEs were identified for each complex, 27 of which involve exchangeable protons. These intermolecular NOEs along with changes in the phosphorus chemical shifts were used to determine the drug binding site on the DNA. As expected, ActD intercalated exclusively at the single d(GC) step in the DNA hairpin. Interestingly, although the two complexes, which differ by the orientation with which the asymmetric drug chromophore intercalates the DNA, were not formed in equal concentrations, their conformations are very similar. The RMS difference of the DNA hairpin in the two complexes is only 1.10 A. The structures of the minor groove binding pentapeptide rings are not affected by any of the changes in the normal double-helical structure imposed by the hairpin loop. The total pairwise RMS difference over all atoms for the four peptides (two per complex) in the calculated structures is 0.72 A. Conversely, the structure of the hairpin loop is not appreciably changed upon binding--the RMS difference between the free DNA loop region and the loop region in the two complexes is 1.68 A and only 0.43 A between the two complexes. Our data also support a possible conformation of the d(T)4 loop that does not possess a thymine-thymine "wobble" base pair.