Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators

D J Heeger1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, California 94305.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|November 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered.

Neuron·2001
Same author

Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception.

Journal of neurophysiology·2001
Same author

Representing retinal image speed in visual cortex.

Nature neuroscience·2001
Same author

Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry.

Nature neuroscience·2000
Same author

Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision.

Vision research·2000
Same journal

Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

When "Noise" Isn't Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS).

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

From discovery to translation: charting a course for the <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Neuromodulatory Strategies Overcome Multiple Inevitable Impairments of Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Acute Fentanyl Toxicity:From Opioid-Induced to Hypoxia-Mediated Pathophysiology.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

A new normalization model explains simple cell responses in vision, moving beyond linear summation. This nonlinear model accurately predicts cell behavior with drifting gratings, improving our understanding of visual processing.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Visual Neuroscience

Background:

  • Simple cells in the visual cortex were traditionally thought to sum inputs linearly.
  • Linear models fail to fully explain the direction selectivity observed in simple-cell responses.
  • Existing physiological data suggests a nonlinear component to simple-cell function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a nonlinear model of simple-cell responses that accounts for a wider range of physiological data.
  • To explain the phenomenon of direction selectivity in simple cells.
  • To provide a computational framework for understanding visual processing nonlinearities.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a normalization model incorporating linear, half-squaring, and divisive normalization nonlinearities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulated model cell responses to drifting and counterphase gratings.
  • Derived mathematical expressions to analyze model behavior and compare it with empirical data.
  • Investigated the model's dynamic responses to stimuli onset.

    • Main Results:

    • The normalization model accurately predicts empirical data, including underestimation and overestimation of responses to nonpreferred and preferred directions, respectively, compared to linear predictions.
    • Model predictions align with findings that linear predictions underestimate direction index from drifting gratings.
    • The model's transient response dynamics qualitatively match experimental observations of simple-cell activity bursts.

    Conclusions:

    • The normalization model provides a comprehensive explanation for simple-cell direction selectivity and responses to visual stimuli.
    • Nonlinear mechanisms, specifically divisive normalization, are crucial for accurately modeling simple-cell function.
    • The model offers insights into the computational principles underlying early visual processing.