Usefulness of mean aortic valve gradient and left ventricular diastolic filling pattern for distinguishing
S L Archer1, D K Mike, M B Hetland
1Veterans Administration Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417.
Insights
Symptomatic men with aortic stenosis have higher aortic gradients and altered diastolic filling patterns compared to asymptomatic individuals. These findings help distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with this condition.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) is a significant valvular heart disease.
- Distinguishing symptomatic from asymptomatic AS is crucial for management.
- Understanding the hemodynamic and functional differences is key.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare hemodynamic and diastolic function between symptomatic and asymptomatic men with aortic stenosis.
- To identify predictors of symptom development in patients with AS.
Main Methods:
- Consecutive men with AS underwent radionuclide angiography at rest and during exercise.
- Measurements included ejection fraction, diastolic filling, and aortic valve area/gradient.
- Follow-up assessed symptom status and valve replacement over 2 years.
Main Results:
- Symptomatic patients had higher mean aortic gradients (53 vs. 37 mm Hg) and lower exercise tolerance.
- Early diastolic filling was enhanced in symptomatic subjects (shorter time to peak filling rate).
- Patients who became symptomatic during follow-up showed increased early diastolic filling and higher gradients.
Conclusions:
- High mean aortic gradients, reduced exercise tolerance, and enhanced early diastolic filling characterize symptomatic AS.
- These parameters can help differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic patients.
- Diastolic dysfunction may play a role in symptom development in AS.
Abstract:
Consecutive, symptomatic (n = 15) and asymptomatic (n = 25) men with aortic stenosis (valve area < 1.2 cm2) and no clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia underwent radionuclide angiography at rest and during supine bicycle ergometry. Ejection fraction, diastolic filling pattern and aortic valve area/gradient were measured on enrollment and when patients became symptomatic (n = 10) or underwent valve replacement (n = 22) during a 2-year follow-up period. Both groups had similar heart rate, blood pressure and ejection fractions, but mean aortic gradients were higher in symptomatic (53 +/- 4 mm Hg) than asymptomatic (37 +/- 2 mm Hg) subjects p < 0.01. Functional limitation evoked by exercise was prevalent even in the asymptomatic group but symptomatic patients exercised to lower work levels than asymptomatic subjects (184 +/- 27 and 307 +/- 32 kg.m/min, respectively, p = 0.02). Ejection fraction failed to increase with exercise in either group. Symptomatic subjects had supranormalization of early diastolic filling with shorter time to the peak filling rate than asymptomatic subjects (137 +/- 16 and 172 +/- 9 ms, respectively, p < 0.05) and a greater first 1/3 filling fraction. The 10 patients who became symptomatic during follow-up had higher first 1/3 filling fractions (53 +/- 7 and 42 +/- 5%, respectively) and mean gradients (41 +/- 4 and 33 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively) than subjects who remained asymptomatic, p < 0.05. High mean aortic gradients, impaired exercise tolerance and enhanced early diastolic filling distinguish symptomatic from asymptomatic patients.
More Related Videos
12:12Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
04:48Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
