Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A pilot syringe exchange program in Washington, DC

D Vlahov1, C Ryan, L Solomon

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health Baltimore, Md.

American Journal of Public Health
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The utility of <i>T. pallidum</i> PCR testing in the diagnosis of congenital syphilis: a systematic review.

Infectious diseases (London, England)·2025
Same author

Central Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index in Older Adults With Intellectual Disabilities.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2025
Same author

Pharmacist prescribing in cancer services: A scoping review.

Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP·2025
Same author

Sex-related pathophysiological mechanisms may be present before symptoms of HFpEF develop.

ESC heart failure·2025
Same author

Comparing self-report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2024
Same author

Echocardiography in Training in Intensive Care - What Have We Learned.

Irish medical journal·2024
Same journal

Erratum In: "Ogunbajo et al. Respond".

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Role of Gender in HIV Care Engagement Among Individuals Assigned Male Sex at Birth: Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2015-2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Domestic Returns to Predictable US Participation in the World Health Organization: Health Security and Cost.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Risks of Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Pulmonary Complications in Cancer Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes and Switch to E-Cigarettes: South Korea, 2015‒2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Retailers CARE Program in Montgomery County, Ohio, Partners With Alcohol, Tobacco, and Lottery Retailers to Promote Healthier Communities.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Trends in Sexual Activity, Condom Use, and Use of Pregnancy Prevention Methods Among Female Adolescents: United States, 2007-2023.

American journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

A pilot syringe exchange program in Washington, DC had low enrollment due to strict criteria. Wider accessibility is needed for future public health impact.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Substance Abuse Research

Background:

  • Syringe exchange programs (SEPs) are crucial for harm reduction among people who inject drugs.
  • Pilot programs are essential for evaluating the feasibility and impact of new public health interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the outcomes of a limited pilot syringe exchange program in Washington, DC.
  • To identify barriers to enrollment and participation in the pilot program.

Main Methods:

  • A 60-day pilot syringe exchange program was implemented at a single drug abuse treatment facility.
  • Eligibility was restricted to adults on the treatment waiting list.
  • Data collected on enrollment, needle distribution and return, and participant demographics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Only 33 out of 467 eligible adults enrolled in the program.
  • The median duration of drug injection among participants was 18 years.
  • 69% of distributed needles were returned, and 27 participants denied needle sharing.

Conclusions:

  • Restrictive eligibility criteria, inconvenient location, and staff attitudes may have contributed to low enrollment.
  • Wider accessibility and broader outreach are necessary for future syringe exchange programs to achieve public health goals.