Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are doctors able to assess prostatic size?

H H Meyhoff, T Hald

    Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
    |January 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Estimating preoperative prostatic weight is unreliable, with significant errors regardless of prostate size or surgeon experience. While estimates correlate with actual weight, accuracy remains a challenge for surgical planning.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evaluation of a Performance-Based Expert Elicitation: WHO Global Attribution of Foodborne Diseases.

    PloS one·2016
    Same author

    Risk ranking of pathogens in ready-to-eat unprocessed foods of non-animal origin (FoNAO) in the EU: initial evaluation using outbreak data (2007-2011).

    International journal of food microbiology·2014
    Same author

    Attributing foodborne salmonellosis in humans to animal reservoirs in the European Union using a multi-country stochastic model.

    Epidemiology and infection·2014
    Same author

    Using surveillance and monitoring data of different origins in a Salmonella source attribution model: a European Union example with challenges and proposed solutions.

    Epidemiology and infection·2014
    Same author

    Source attribution of human campylobacteriosis in Denmark.

    Epidemiology and infection·2013
    Same author

    Source attribution of human campylobacteriosis using a meta-analysis of case-control studies of sporadic infections.

    Epidemiology and infection·2012
    Same journal

    Fine Needle Biopsy of Metastases at Retrograde Pyelography, Directed by Fluoroscopy.

    Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2017
    Same journal

    Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate Presenting as a Retrovesical Cyst.

    Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2016
    Same journal

    A Pilot Study of Metabolic Effects of Intravenously Given Alpha-Calcidol In Patients With Chronicc Renal Failure.

    Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2016
    Same journal

    Seventh Report on the Standardisation of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function: Lower Urinary Tract Rehabilitation Techniques.

    Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2016
    Same journal

    Risk factors and interventional strategies for BK polyomavirus infection after renal transplantation.

    Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2012
    Same journal

    Initial symptoms and delay in patients with penile carcinoma.

    Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2012
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Surgical Planning
    • Medical Imaging Analysis

    Background:

    • Accurate preoperative prostatic weight estimation is crucial for surgical planning.
    • Existing methods for estimating prostatic weight exhibit variability.
    • The impact of surgeon experience on estimation accuracy is not well-defined.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the between-observer variation in preoperative prostatic weight estimation.
    • To assess the accuracy and reliability of these estimations.
    • To determine the correlation between estimated and actual operative prostatic weight.

    Main Methods:

    • Three independent weight estimations were performed per patient for 40 patients.
    • Data analyzed to quantify estimation errors and observer variability.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlation analysis performed between estimated and actual weights.

    • Main Results:

    • Estimates showed considerable error magnitude, irrespective of prostate size.
    • Experienced urologists did not achieve more reliable estimates than inexperienced ones.
    • Approximately two-thirds of estimates were within +/- 25 g of the actual weight.
    • A statistically significant correlation was found between estimated and actual weights.

    Conclusions:

    • Preoperative prostatic weight estimation is subject to significant between-observer variation.
    • Surgeon experience does not reliably improve estimation accuracy.
    • Despite correlation, current estimation methods lack sufficient precision for all surgical planning needs.